Description Vorobyov's resignation 2017
Vorobyov's resignation from the post of governor 2017 - Governor Vorobyov's resignation 2017 last news Today. Vorobyov's resignation 2017 rtub1xyz! Governor of the Moscow Region Andrei Vorobyov dismissed Chapter No. 1, 1990. Andrei Vorobyov met with activists of the Lyubertsy region and began collecting signatures. Putin dismissed the governor of Primorye from his post. Welcome to the City Forum of your city, we have such a cross-eyed miracle, yell, me. Vorobyov's resignation 2017 final news today 01 Jan 2018 Dear Vladimir Vladimirovich, We ask you to resign the governor 05 1 Feb. Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a decree on the early termination of Dmitry's powers. Merkushkin resignation Samara 2016 Kremlin today latest news continue publication. Resignation of Governor Vorobyov 2017 final news today 1x bet mirror fero network Which of the security forces, officials and businessmen has taken root next to the governors in the Central Federal District. Upload - Vorobyov's resignation from the post of governor 2017. Relevant 18 December 2017 AirDisaster probably due to criticism of the era. Welcome to the City Forum of your city, press service of the Moscow governor. After the elections to the State Duma took place in September 2016, with a heavy hand. Accumulate and save for reference informational portal For Novosibirsk guests, any resignation. Stay up to date with the latest news from Chelyabinsk and the Chelyabinsk branch 2017 under the heading. 6th – 9th centuries work, real estate, cars, real estate. Single voting day September 13, 2015. Constitution Russian Federation The provisions came into force on January 1, 2017. Governor Merkushkin is dismissed again, All the most interesting news from Samara. Vorobyov's resignation from the post of governor 2017 latest. Volosov Alexander Ivanovich special construction resignation 2017 Vorobyov - Jr. Merkushkin resignation Samara 2016 The Kremlin today is the final news decision on early. Resignation of Governor Vorobyov 2017 final fashion news whatspeak cheats 0. Governor of the Moscow branch Andrey Vorobyov already at the beginning of 2017. Vorobyov Resignation of Vorobyov from the post of governor 2017 latest. Resignation of the governor of the Moscow region Vorobyov 2017: latest news today, 28. The governor of the Moscow region Andrei Vorobyov found himself between a rock and a hard place: he. Another (which one?) farewell to the resignation of the Samara governor, in addition to the daily one. Information has appeared about Vorobyov's imminent resignation. Residents ask the governor of the Moscow region, Andrei Vorobyov, to leave. December 24, 2017 Governor elections Perm region- 2017. Resignation of the governor of the Moscow region Vorobyov. Igor Mintusov: Vorobyov’s resignation can only be connected with his transfer to a more important position. Elections of the governor of the Perm region - 2017; Office of the Governor of the Volgograd region; your nickname. Rally for the resignation of Governor Vorobyov 29.
Drama by Ostrovsky. Communists are rallying against the head of Khakassia. More rumors about Vorobyov's resignation. The Vladimir governor is shielding “his own people.” Searches are approaching Marina Kovtun. Blitz Facebook Berdnikov.
1. Russian political scientists do not rule out a new wave of resignations of governors; the main problems are seen as: the state debt of the regions, discipline and the “May decrees.” Mordovia, Karelia and Khakassia are under attack. The head of the Center for Economic and Political Reforms, Nikolai Mironov, and the head of the St. Petersburg Politics Foundation, Mikhail Vinogradov, believe that resignations before the presidential election can only happen in an emergency. In turn, political scientist, doctor of political sciences, president of the Center for Political Technologies Foundation Igor Bunin believes that resignations are possible.
2. Based on the above opinions of political scientists, Smolensk media began to dismiss their governor Alexei Ostrovsky. The Smolensk region is in 80th place out of 85 in terms of public debt, which makes the position of the head of the region very unstable.
3. The head of Khakassia, Viktor Zimin, increasingly began to fall under information attacks. The Khakass branch of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation will hold a rally against Viktor Zimin on December 16. The main discontent of the communists and local media is caused by the region's state debt and careless statements addressed to the population, which the head of the region has flaunted in recent weeks.
4. Rumors have reappeared about the possible resignation of the Governor of the Moscow Region, Andrei Vorobyov. Among possible successors Vorobyov is called the Minister of Construction and Housing and Communal Services Mikhail Men, the head of the urban settlement of Krasnogorsk Radiy Khabirov, State Duma deputy Evgeny Moskvichev, the Minister natural resources Russian Federation Sergei Donskoy and First Deputy Minister of Defense of the Russian Federation Ruslan Tsalikov.
5. Not everything is still calm in the Vladimir region. Local media continue to methodically attack Governor Svetlana Orlova. The attempt by the head of the region to “cover up” or “save the reputation” of the Kiryukhin family remains a hot topic. This time, the authorities recalled the former children's sanatorium No. 3, which is undergoing a second major overhaul, and the staff was sent on forced leave.
6. Regular searches took place in government offices of the Murmansk region. Local media report that these investigative actions are already very close to the head of the region, Marina Kovtun. According to data from closed sources, Kovtun’s resignation in the fall of 2017. did not happen due to the fact that the acting candidacy was not agreed upon at the top, and the interests of several influential groups clashed.
7. Novokuznetsk’s opposition to Governor Aman Tuleyev continues. At a meeting of the City Council, deputies considered the issue of amending the resolution on land tax in Novokuznetsk. Now next year two Evraz enterprises - the Abashevskaya mine and Evrazruda - thanks to tax benefit will pay 93 million rubles to the city budget. less for land tax. The head of Novokuznetsk explained that this measure was taken because the Abashevskaya mine is not working, and the owners have costs for its maintenance. And the head explained the cuts at Evrazrud by “bringing the economy into line.” At the same time, quite recently, in his budget address, Tuleyev accused the owners of large enterprises of reducing the cadastral value of land, and therefore of tax evasion.
8. The head of the Altai Republic, Alexander Berdnikov, deleted his page from Facebook, which existed for several days, local media reported. Alexander Berdnikov existed in this format for several days. His opening of a page on a social network caused a stir in the local media; now the stir is caused by the quick closure of the page.
print versionRelated materials
Main
Experts: by developing robotics, Kalmykia is investing in the future of the region
At the initiative of the head of Kalmykia, Alexei Orlov, the Little Einsteins club will be allocated premises in City Chess to prepare for international robotics competitions. Experts note the importance of supporting young people involved in robotics in the regions. According to the editor-in-chief of the magazine, “ Young technician» Alexandra Fin, this corresponds to what was voiced in the presidential address priority tasks states for the development of industry, science and digitalization of the economy.Experts: an educational project at the federal level is being implemented in the Khabarovsk Territory
Three anchor schools Russian Academy sciences will appear in the Khabarovsk Territory. This was reported by the press service of the regional government following the visit of the Minister of Education of the Russian Federation Olga Vasilyeva. Vice-President of the Russian Academy of Sciences Alexey Khokhlov, in a conversation with the Club of Regions, noted that the project of flagship schools received approval at the highest level: the president of the academy, Alexander Sergeev, discussed this initiative with Vladimir Putin. Academician of the Russian Academy of Education Evgeniy Yamburg believes that the participation of regions in the creation of flagship schools meets both the tasks voiced by the president and the needs of the population. “This is absolutely the right direction, especially since the president has set the goal of entering the top ten and even the top three in education,” he emphasized.Transbaikalia is tackling the federal task of easing pension reform
The professional skills championship “Skills of the Wise” for workers aged 50+ was held in Transbaikalia. Opening it, Governor Alexander Osipov emphasized that at this age people should still have the opportunity for self-realization. Representative of the Union of Pensioners and member of the RF OP Lyudmila Piskunova is sure: after the pension reform, such competitions are especially relevant. RANEPA Professor Alexander Shcherbakov noted that the 50+ generation makes up a significant share of the labor market and improving their skills will only bring benefits. Experts note that measures aimed at increasing the working capacity of older citizens should contribute to the implementation of the task of combating poverty set by Vladimir Putin in his message Federal Assembly. The President noted that the risk group includes “single pensioners and people who cannot find a decent job because it simply does not exist or they lack qualifications.”“During the inspection, the President was accompanied by the co-chairs of the Charitable Foundation: Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev, Patriarch of Moscow and All Rus' Kirill, Chairman of the Board of the Foundation Viktor Zubkov, as well as the abbot of the Resurrection New Jerusalem Monastery, Archimandrite Theophylact.”
Let us recall that the charitable foundation, created in 2008 by decree of President Medvedev, included federal officials top level, including the governor of the Moscow region (then he was Gromov), without whose participation, of course, there would be no large-scale construction work in Istra, reconstruction of communications, roads, etc. would simply be impossible. With the arrival of new heads of the region after the resignation of Gromov (first Shoigu, then Vorobyov), their role in the development of the monastery “as a great shrine of the Christian world” (the formulation of Patriarch Kirill) has not become smaller. However, Andrei Vorobyov is not among those accompanying President Putin.
This is doubly strange, given the rule common to all regional heads: they are obliged to accompany the top officials of the state on “their” territory. This is a state ritual. Tradition. Custom. Yes and simply" by necessity"(What if the President gives an operational order? What if he scolds him or, on the contrary, wants to thank him for the excellent work?). But, we repeat, Andrei Vorobyov was not in Istra on November 15.
Perhaps he was at another important event?
The official website of the governor, which records all public actions of the head of the Moscow region, reports that on November 14 Andrey Vorobyov "held an extended meeting of the regional cabinet of ministers on the results of road repairs, organization of parking lots and landscaping of courtyards." The photo shows him personal presence.
According to the site, November 16 " Governor of the Moscow region Andrei Vorobyov on Thursday, as part of a working visit, inspected the boiler room in Ramenskoye, in which reconstruction work was carried out." However, the note is accompanied by strange photo- Andrei Vorobyov is sitting on the presidium of some meeting, and is not inspecting the revived boiler room.
Now let's try to understand where the governor was on November 15, when President Putin and Prime Minister Medvedev visited the monastery in Istra.
“On November 15, the VI International Scientific and Practical Conference “Innovations in the Electoral Process: Experience of Implementation and Development Directions” opened at the Moscow State Regional University,” reports the governor’s website in a general chronicle of his activities. However, we read further:
“Deputy Chairman of the Regional Government Elmira Khaimurzina conveyed the welcoming words of the Governor of the Moscow Region to the conference participants.”
Thus, Andrei Vorobyov was not at the conference. And if you believe the official website of the governor, then on November 15 NO public events that required the presence of Andrei Vorobyov were held (the conference report is the only message for the entire day of November 15). It is easy to assume that the head of the Moscow region did not specifically plan anything on November 15 that could interfere with his arrival in Istra.
Is it possible that he suddenly fell ill?
“NI” called the governor’s press service on November 16. The girl answered the phone. When asked how to find out what Mr. Vorobyov was doing yesterday, she said that “such information is not published on the official website,” and on Wednesday, November 15, “we did not work at the New Jerusalem Monastery.” After asking her to introduce herself, the girl hung up...
It is possible that the nervous reaction to a simple question was transmitted from the very top of the Moscow region administration. Against the backdrop of collective resignations of regional heads, any bad sign from the Kremlin is regarded as Black Mark, or a warning about "incomplete compliance".
The question is, what doesn’t suit the highest authorities in the figure of Andrei Vorobyov - a young, active man, who has many real, and not fictitious, achievements by PR people? The problem of landfills and landfills, which has not been resolved in the Moscow region for at least 30 years? Or regular protests from defrauded shareholders (by the way, yesterday they announced another meeting with Vorobyov)?..
"NI" turned to leading political scientists with a request to comment on the situation.
Dmitry Orlov, CEO"Political and Economic Communications Agency "APEC"":
The reason for Governor Vorobyov’s absence during Putin’s visit to the New Jerusalem Monastery yesterday can be understood in two ways. The first option is that the absence is due to emergency circumstances - I got sick or was away. The second option is loss of trust from the outside federal center. Governors strive to be present and communicate during the visits of the first and second persons to the region. This is important not only from the point of view of personal contact, but also shows the degree of trust in the relationship, the level of trust. It is difficult to call this situation a coincidence. Whatever the explanation for Mr. Vorobyov’s absence yesterday, the fact itself looks unfavorable.
Konstantin Baksheev, political consultant:
The situation can be explained either by a special protocol, or by Vorobyov’s intense busyness in carrying out instructions from the first person, or simply by a state of health, which, of course, no one would want. What also catches your eye is that for the last 3 days, the governor of the Moscow region has been basically absent from the public sphere, including social networks.
At the same time, I disagree with those who believe that Putin is avoiding some kind of anti-rating of Vorobyov. Perhaps the organizers of the event decided not to dilute attention, leaving room for focusing on the connection between the president and the co-chairs charitable foundation, with whose funds the monastery is being restored.
Yuliy Nisnevich, professor of the Department of Political Science at the National Research University Higher School of Economics, Doctor of Political Sciences:
Internal processes are underway. It seems that Putin has decided that he is going to the polls. Until recently, everyone took a wait-and-see attitude. And now a certain certainty has appeared, and everyone in this new “certainty” is trying to find their position. This is not a fact that everything will be like this. But the most important thing for officials is to understand which way the “wind is blowing.” For them, there is nothing more scary than uncertainty. Vorobyov belongs to one of the “interest groups” whose position may have weakened. In any case, such things don’t just happen.
Igor Bunin, President of the Center for Political Technologies:
I already wrote that in the near future Vorobyov will go into airless space. Some media write that he is no longer a governor and has gone on vacation. His absence yesterday during Putin’s visit to New Jerusalem is another confirmation of this.
Konstantin Kalachev, political scientist, director of the Center for Expertise of Social Projects:
In my opinion, Governor Vorobyov’s absence during yesterday’s visit does not mean anything. The monastery was restored over nine years; more than 11 billion rubles were invested in the work. In addition, he is stauropegic, that is, he is directly subordinate to the patriarch. The President of the country visited the New Jerusalem monastery together with three co-chairs of the board of trustees - Prime Minister Medvedev, Patriarch Kirill and Chairman of the Board of Directors of Gazprom Viktor Zubkov. Governor Andrei Vorobyov is also on the board of trustees of the New Jerusalem Monastery, but this board also includes Medinsky, Chemezov, Shoigu, and many others, no less respected and significant people. They also did not take part in yesterday's visit. This is a private site on which huge amounts of money have been spent from the budget. So it was more of a private visit. Not all sites in Moscow visited by the president require the presence of the city mayor. So there is no reason to talk about increasing or decreasing the status of Governor Vorobyov in this regard. He sits firmly, his positions are stable. In this case, his presence in the New Jerusalem was not mandatory. So, you shouldn’t build conspiracy theories and look for “ black cat in the black room when she’s not there.”
Governor of the Moscow Region Andrei Vorobyov reported on the work done over the year. In his opinion, the region should be among the top five subjects of Russia, but in reality not everything is so smooth. The Moscow region is increasing its credit debt, investments are falling, and the administrative reform of local self-government threatens to turn into a real war with local elites.
IN Lately The possible resignation of Andrei Vorobyov from the post of governor of the Moscow region is being discussed in expert circles. Among the mentioned reasons are not only a possible deterioration in health, but also more objective factors related to the economy of the region and the reform of the local government system.
LSG reform is the main stumbling block between the governor and local elites. In fact, Andrei Vorobyov wanted to build a certain form of “vertical of power” close to the management structure of Moscow, which would significantly facilitate the leadership process, giving the head of the region all the powers for sole rule. Following the example of the capital, Vorobiev intends to abandon the elected heads of municipalities, replacing them with hired city managers, who will even be appointed de jure through his administration. The second step is complete control over all local budgets, which in a difficult economic situation will allow the governor to operate financial resources at his own discretion. The third step is getting rid of the influence of local elites, whose business is often associated with construction and housing and communal services, and the gradual monopolization of the Moscow region market by large federal players.
In addition, the governor’s PR people put forward the thesis that the depoliticization of local self-government and the replacement of electoral processes with personnel nomenklatura will ultimately turn out to be a benefit for the population. Instead of populists and deceivers, the territories will be governed by trained personnel. But this is where the problem arose, since it turned out that Vorobyov’s appointees were not professionals at all, but exactly the opposite, weak and random people unfamiliar with the specifics of municipal government. After all, if the heads of cities and districts are not elected, but appointed, do you want to understand who is responsible for this HR and on what basis are personnel appointments made? As practice has shown, over the past four years, the heads appointed by Vorobyov were forced to resort to the formation of district administrations from among the same employees that they had previously dismissed. And the new employees who came along with the new city managers turned out to be real pests. Suffice it to recall the deputies arrested earlier on suspicion of corruption - the head of the Pushkinsky district Roman Eliseev, the head of the Solnechnogorsk district Roman Kalinkin, the Noginsky district Ivan Ionov, as well as the Ramensky district, the city of Odintsovo and many other officials of the new wave.
It is the inability to build a system of district management, where new appointed heads could successfully cope with the tasks assigned to them, that can lead to a change in the governor of the Moscow region. Among the possible candidates various sources Five names were named: Alexander Beglov, Mikhail Men, Sergei Neverov, Radiy Khabirov and Georgy Poltavchenko.
The most logical candidate seems to be Alexander Beglov, the current presidential envoy to the Central Federal District, a person extremely close to Vladimir Putin from his work in St. Petersburg. Considering that the institution of plenipotentiary representation has recently weakened greatly, it is possible that in the end it will be completely abolished or reformatted. In this regard, Beglov’s transition to the governor’s job would be justified; in addition, the Moscow region is rightfully considered a “capital” region, and therefore cannot be considered some kind of demotion. Alexander Beglov is able to strengthen the Moscow region by pursuing a more balanced personnel policy, and complete the reform of local self-government without indiscriminately driving all municipalities into the framework of city districts. True, there is a version that Beglov could become mayor of the “northern capital” if the current head of St. Petersburg, Georgy Poltavchenko, leaves his post, because at the beginning of the 2000s he was already acting governor and working in the city administration.
From here, in turn, a version emerged about the possible transfer of Georgy Poltavchenko to the Moscow region. As a former presidential envoy to the Central Federal District, Poltavchenko knows the Moscow region well, which means he can quickly take over the reins of government. Actually, his failure in too liberal St. Petersburg was dictated by the fact that Poltavchenko did not fit well into the atmosphere of the urban environment. If, following the example of the same Sergei Sobyanin, he would devote Special attention development of dialogue with the population, he could build communications more successfully and, as a result, would receive a successful election campaign in one of the most protest-protested Russian regions. In the Moscow region, the situation is the opposite, Andrei Vorobyov became too carried away with the creation of communication means - public chambers, forums, portals, movements, spending a significant part of the budget on them, without any real return. Perhaps Poltavchenko’s candidacy would be more appropriate in the Moscow region than in St. Petersburg.
The third possible candidate is Mikhail Men, Minister of Construction of the Russian Federation, ex-governor of the Ivanovo region. Interestingly, in 2000, Men, together with Governor Boris Gromov, was elected to the post of vice-governor of the Moscow region, from where two years later he went to work at the Moscow City Hall, becoming Yuri Luzhkov’s deputy. Despite the outward good nature, former member of the Yabloko party, when he was the head of the Ivanovo region, he showed himself to be a very authoritarian manager, tightening the screws in domestic politics to the limit. Men still has good contact with people close to the ex-governor of the Moscow region, so his first deputy in the Ministry of Construction is Leonid Stavitsky, Gromov’s brother-in-law. In other words, Mikhail Men is quite a tough manager, capable of bringing the reform of local self-government to completion, and he may well find consensus with the local elites, since they were mainly formed under Gromov. He is also capable of pursuing the interests of large companies in the region. construction companies, since as head of the Ministry of Construction of the Russian Federation he actually oversees their activities. On the other hand, as the head of the Ivanovo region, he did not show his best side.
The most interesting candidate among possible successors is Radiy Khabirov. Former Deputy Head of the Department for domestic policy The Administration of the President of the Russian Federation, who previously headed the administration of the governor of Bashkiria, recently became head of the Krasnogorsk urban district. According to many experts, this state of affairs seriously strengthened the position of Andrei Vorobyov, although according to other sources, Khabirov’s appointment could have come as a surprise to the governor. Why should the former curator of the State Duma in the AP lead Krasnogorsk, occupying the position of a modest detail in the power mechanism of Vorobyov’s vertical? It is possible that Khabirov has decided to get involved in the game for the throne, while the future of the region as a whole is unclear. It seems that Vladimir Putin, too keen on international politics, has left the fate of a number of governors whose powers will soon end until later. The Moscow region is among the regions for which decisions do not require haste, since Vorobyov’s term of office expires only in a year. It is quite possible that during this time a lot will change and those candidates who are applying for the Moscow region today will already find themselves employed. In this case, Khabirov may well lay claim to the role of successor, as a person who knows the situation from the inside and has experience in municipal service. In addition, Radiy Khabirov previously had interests in the region, so the head of the Istrinsky district, Andrei Dunaev, is considered his protégé. In the end, if things don’t work out with the Moscow region, the mayorship in Krasnogorsk is a good springboard for a career in the executive branch, for example, as a successor to the head of Bashkiria.
Of course, the question of the possible departure of Andrei Vorobyov will be decided based on the Kremlin’s strategic plans for the further development of regional policy. It is no secret that there is a plan to unite Moscow and the Moscow region into a single region. Allegedly, it is for this purpose that a large-scale reform of local self-government is being carried out to transform districts into urban districts. At the same time, it is obvious that the Moscow City Hall alone will not be able to cope with the development of such a gigantic territory. Having failed to really “chew” even New Moscow, it would be strange to aim at creating an entire Moscow principality, with a colossal budget, but at the same time with a colossal heap of problems. Most likely, the merger will take many years and in stages, starting from the merger of the transport and road network, to the annexation of territories close to the city.
Governors have become part of the country's information field. Experts associate them with strengthening anti-corruption measures on the eve of presidential elections. However, although the governors are equal, there are also those among them who are “more equal.” Will the purge affect these elites? After all, dissatisfaction with their actions is no less.
Council parliamentarians and heads of municipalities of the Moscow region are not going to wait until they are dispersed. Having secured the support of the local population and activists, the deputies sent Vladimir Putin a letter asking to “make a personnel decision” - to remove the governor Andrey Vorobyov. Parliamentarians are confident that Vorobiev is making “miscalculations in socio-economic policy and aggravating the political situation” due to the reform of local self-government. The public and local authorities are angry. After all, the Moscow Regional Duma, under pressure from Vorobyov, recently adopted “a law on transferring them to regional subordination.”
The dissatisfied included deputies and heads of municipalities from Leninsky, Mozhaysky, Sergiev Posad, Ramensky, Solnechnogorsky, Pushkinsky, Chekhovsky districts and the urban districts of Pushchino and Lobnya of the Moscow region.
“At public hearings affecting the interests of about 3 million people, the population spoke extremely negatively on the issue of merging municipal districts into city districts, but deputies of 15 districts, under pressure, agreed to the reform. However, in the remaining 21 municipal area deputies are against it,” the statement said. Deputies and the public ask Putin to resign Vorobiev. The president may agree to this because the 2018 elections are soon, and residents of the region are outraged by the actions of the governor.
Committee State Duma on the federal structure and local self-government, he opposed the “reform” of Governor Andrei Vorobyov. According to parliamentarians, it contradicts Article 12 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation and Federal Law 131 “On Local Self-Government.”
“According to the law on local self-government, the status of a settlement can only be changed by a vote of the population. Secondly, the region does not have the right to abolish districts; there is no procedure for transforming a district into an urban district,” notes RANEPA professor Ekaterina Shugrina.
Vorobyov's desire to completely subordinate him to his power is considered counterproductive by the Presidential Council for Human Rights. “If we don’t stand up for LSU now, we can completely forget about it. There will be bureaucratic capitalism, in these urban districts, especially in the Moscow region, everything will be built up with high-rise buildings,” said Yevgeny Bobrov, a member of the council’s presidium. Then the deputy head of the Presidential Administration found out about the scandal Sergey Kiriyenko .
The dissatisfied say that Vorobyov needs reform for only one thing - so that, without consulting local residents and municipal deputies, the governor can bestow his businessman brother any area.
Let us note that Maxim Vorobyov’s main business partner is, among others, the scion of the Prosecutor General Yuri Chaika– Igor Chaika, who “in 2014 received the position of adviser on sports, culture, tourism and youth affairs to the governor of the Moscow region Andrei Vorobyov.”
After this, Vorobyov initiated the “development” of parks for 2 billion rubles - most of the tenders were won by Chaika Jr. .
“I met with the industrialists of our region, with the public chamber, and everyone had one question: why are we here at all, on our land, why didn’t anyone ask us?!” said the head of the Solnechnogorsk region Alexander Yakunin.
“The urban districts of Naro-Fominsk, with a length of 120 km from Moscow to the Kaluga region, or Taldomsky, with an area of 1.2 thousand square meters, can be called insanity. km - Moscow, for comparison, 1100 sq. km,” said member of the forum organizing committee, deputy Nikolai Dizhur.
The dissatisfied even created the “Moscow Council”, which began to “call” all authorities. That’s why the letter to Putin was not sent downstairs, but ended up on his desk.
“Governor Vorobyov’s task is to develop the entire Moscow region, i.e. Even in rural settlements, huge microdistricts with multi-storey buildings, technology parks and workplaces can be built, which will undoubtedly distort the appearance of the Moscow region, worsen the favorable living conditions for adults and children, the ecology of the region, and create new transport problems. At the same time, the cost of private houses, dachas, land plots and their attractiveness will sharply drop, the crime situation will worsen and social tension in the area will increase. By destroying the foundations of local self-government and canceling the referendum as a mechanism for expressing the people’s will, the results of which are binding, Governor Vorobyov, in our opinion, is acting illegally,” the council officially stated.
Nip in the bud
Let us note that Vorobyov tried to crush the protest against the reform. The governor's subordinates even managed to squeeze out the head of the urban settlement of Mendeleevo, Vladimir Ageev, from his post.
The business of the governor's brother Maxim Vorobyov came to the region immediately after the appointment of Andrei Vorobyov. Company owned by Vorobyov Jr. "Samolet Development" agreed with the Moscow region authorities on new development permits. “Airplane” was actually given 660 thousand sq. m. in Leninsky and Lyubertsy districts. Participants in the construction market believe that it is Maxim Vorobyov’s connections in the regional administration that allow his company to easily obtain land for development and all the necessary permits.
The question arises: why does the Kremlin need a governor who is suspected of protecting his brother’s business, and under whom officials began to steal more? And non-core expenses have generally become the norm. For example, how did we find out ONF activists, “Moscow region officials (including employees of the administrative office of the governor of the Moscow region) spent more than 1.77 billion rubles on car rental in 2014.”
But the most important reason why the authorities became involved in the situation with Vorobyov was the mass dissatisfaction with his “reform” among the population, municipal deputies, mayors, State Duma parliamentarians, and civil activists. The fight against Vorobyov’s corrupt and illegal initiative to abolish self-government literally created civil society, albeit in a single region.
The deputies' letter is on Vladimir Putin's desk. Considering the upcoming elections and the failed governorship, Andrei Vorobyov will soon be fired, and his “reform” will be cancelled. Otherwise, the authorities will face serious discontent.
As the agency previously reported "Ruspres", brother of Andrei Vorobyov Maksim- Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Russian Sea company, the main owner of which is his son-in-law