From the above article you can find out what the limit is and what it is eaten with - this is VERY important. Why? You may not understand what determinants are and successfully solve them; you may not understand at all what a derivative is and find them with an “A”. But if you don’t understand what a limit is, then solving practical tasks will be difficult. It would also be a good idea to familiarize yourself with the sample solutions and my design recommendations. All information is presented in a simple and accessible form.
And for the purposes of this lesson we will need the following teaching materials: Wonderful Limits And Trigonometric formulas. They can be found on the page. It is best to print out the manuals - it is much more convenient, and besides, you will often have to refer to them offline.
What is so special about remarkable limits? The remarkable thing about these limits is that they were proven by the greatest minds of famous mathematicians, and grateful descendants do not have to suffer from terrible limits with a pile of trigonometric functions, logarithms, powers. That is, when finding the limits, we will use ready-made results that have been proven theoretically.
There are several wonderful limits, but in practice, in 95% of cases, part-time students have two wonderful limits: The first wonderful limit, Second wonderful limit. It should be noted that these are historically established names, and when, for example, they talk about “the first remarkable limit,” they mean by this a very specific thing, and not some random limit taken from the ceiling.
The first wonderful limit
Consider the following limit: (instead of the native letter “he” I will use the Greek letter “alpha”, this is more convenient from the point of view of presenting the material).
According to our rule for finding limits (see article Limits. Examples of solutions) we try to substitute zero into the function: in the numerator we get zero (the sine of zero is zero), and in the denominator, obviously, there is also zero. Thus, we are faced with an uncertainty of the form, which, fortunately, does not need to be disclosed. I know mathematical analysis, it is proved that:
This mathematical fact is called The first wonderful limit. I won’t give an analytical proof of the limit, but here it is: geometric meaning we'll look at it in class about infinitesimal functions.
Often in practical tasks functions can be arranged differently, this does not change anything:
- the same first wonderful limit.
But you cannot rearrange the numerator and denominator yourself! If a limit is given in the form , then it must be solved in the same form, without rearranging anything.
In practice, not only a variable can act as a parameter, but also elementary function, complex function. The only important thing is that it tends to zero.
Examples:
, , 
, 
Here , , , 
, and everything is good - the first wonderful limit is applicable.
But the following entry is heresy:
Why? Because the polynomial does not tend to zero, it tends to five.
By the way, a quick question: what is the limit? 
? The answer can be found at the end of the lesson.
In practice, not everything is so smooth; almost never a student is offered to solve a free limit and get an easy pass. Hmmm... I’m writing these lines, and a very important thought came to mind - after all, it’s better to remember “free” mathematical definitions and formulas by heart, this can provide invaluable help in the test, when the question will be decided between “two” and “three”, and the teacher decides to ask the student some simple question or offer to solve simplest example(“maybe he (s) still knows what?!”).
Let's move on to consider practical examples:
Example 1
Find the limit
If we notice a sine in the limit, then this should immediately lead us to think about the possibility of applying the first remarkable limit.
First, we try to substitute 0 into the expression under the limit sign (we do this mentally or in a draft):
So we have an uncertainty of the form be sure to indicate in making a decision. The expression under the limit sign is similar to the first wonderful limit, but this is not exactly it, it is under the sine, but in the denominator.
In such cases, we need to organize the first remarkable limit ourselves, using an artificial technique. The line of reasoning could be as follows: “under the sine we have , which means that we also need to get in the denominator.”
And this is done very simply:
That is, the denominator is artificially multiplied in this case by 7 and divided by the same seven. Now our recording has taken on a familiar shape.
When the task is drawn up by hand, it is advisable to mark the first remarkable limit with a simple pencil:
What happened? In fact, our circled expression turned into a unit and disappeared in the work: 
Now all that remains is to get rid of the three-story fraction: 
Who has forgotten the simplification of multi-level fractions, please refresh the material in the reference book Hot formulas for school mathematics course .
Ready. Final answer:
If you don’t want to use pencil marks, then the solution can be written like this:
“
Let's use the first wonderful limit 
“
Example 2
Find the limit
Again we see a fraction and a sine in the limit. Let’s try to substitute zero into the numerator and denominator:
Indeed, we have uncertainty and, therefore, we need to try to organize the first wonderful limit. At the lesson Limits. Examples of solutions we considered the rule that when we have uncertainty, we need to factorize the numerator and denominator. Here it’s the same thing, we’ll represent the degrees as a product (multipliers):
Similar to the previous example, we draw a pencil around the remarkable limits (here there are two of them), and indicate that they tend to unity:
Actually, the answer is ready:
In the following examples, I will not do art in Paint, I think how to correctly draw up a solution in a notebook - you already understand.
Example 3
Find the limit
We substitute zero into the expression under the limit sign:
An uncertainty has been obtained that needs to be disclosed. If there is a tangent in the limit, then it is almost always converted into sine and cosine using the well-known trigonometric formula (by the way, they do approximately the same thing with cotangent, see Fig. methodological material Hot trigonometric formulas On the page Mathematical formulas, tables and reference materials).
In this case:
The cosine of zero is equal to one, and it’s easy to get rid of it (don’t forget to mark that it tends to one):
Thus, if in the limit the cosine is a MULTIPLIER, then, roughly speaking, it needs to be turned into a unit, which disappears in the product.
Here everything turned out simpler, without any multiplications and divisions. The first remarkable limit also turns into one and disappears in the product:
As a result, infinity is obtained, and this happens.
Example 4
Find the limit
Let's try to substitute zero into the numerator and denominator:
The uncertainty is obtained (the cosine of zero, as we remember, is equal to one)
We use the trigonometric formula. Take note! For some reason, limits using this formula are very common.
Let us move the constant factors beyond the limit icon:
Let's organize the first wonderful limit:
Here we have only one remarkable limit, which turns into one and disappears in the product:
Let's get rid of the three-story structure:
The limit is actually solved, we indicate that the remaining sine tends to zero:
Example 5
Find the limit 
This example is more complicated, try to figure it out yourself:
Some limits can be reduced to the 1st remarkable limit by changing a variable, you can read about this a little later in the article Methods for solving limits.
Second wonderful limit
In the theory of mathematical analysis it has been proven that:
This fact is called second wonderful limit.
Reference: 
is an irrational number.
The parameter can be not only a variable, but also a complex function. The only important thing is that it strives for infinity.
Example 6
Find the limit
When the expression under the limit sign is in a degree, this is the first sign that you need to try to apply the second wonderful limit.
But first, as always, we try to substitute endlessly big number in the expression on what principle this is done, discussed in the lesson Limits. Examples of solutions.
It is easy to notice that when the base of the degree is , and the exponent is , that is, there is uncertainty of the form:
This uncertainty is precisely revealed with the help of the second remarkable limit. But, as often happens, the second wonderful limit does not lie on a silver platter, and it needs to be artificially organized. One can reason as follows: in in this example parameter, which means that in the indicator we also need to organize . To do this, we raise the base to the power, and so that the expression does not change, we raise it to the power:
When the task is completed by hand, we mark with a pencil:
Almost everything is ready, the terrible degree has turned into a nice letter:
In this case, we move the limit icon itself to the indicator:
Example 7
Find the limit
Attention! This type of limit occurs very often, please study this example very carefully.
Let's try to substitute an infinitely large number into the expression under the limit sign:
The result is uncertainty. But the second remarkable limit applies to the uncertainty of the form. What to do? We need to convert the base of the degree. We reason like this: in the denominator we have , which means that in the numerator we also need to organize .
The formula for the second remarkable limit is lim x → ∞ 1 + 1 x x = e. Another form of writing looks like this: lim x → 0 (1 + x) 1 x = e.
When we talk about the second remarkable limit, we have to deal with uncertainty of the form 1 ∞, i.e. unit to an infinite degree.
Yandex.RTB R-A-339285-1
Let's consider problems in which the ability to calculate the second remarkable limit will be useful.
Example 1
Find the limit lim x → ∞ 1 - 2 x 2 + 1 x 2 + 1 4 .
Solution
Let's substitute the required form lu and perform the calculations.
lim x → ∞ 1 - 2 x 2 + 1 x 2 + 1 4 = 1 - 2 ∞ 2 + 1 ∞ 2 + 1 4 = 1 - 0 ∞ = 1 ∞
Our answer turned out to be one to the power of infinity. To determine the solution method, we use the uncertainty table. Let's choose the second remarkable limit and make a change of variables.
t = - x 2 + 1 2 ⇔ x 2 + 1 4 = - t 2
If x → ∞, then t → - ∞.
Let's see what we got after the replacement:
lim x → ∞ 1 - 2 x 2 + 1 x 2 + 1 4 = 1 ∞ = lim x → ∞ 1 + 1 t - 1 2 t = lim t → ∞ 1 + 1 t t - 1 2 = e - 1 2
Answer: lim x → ∞ 1 - 2 x 2 + 1 x 2 + 1 4 = e - 1 2 .
Example 2
Calculate the limit lim x → ∞ x - 1 x + 1 x .
Solution
Let's substitute infinity and get the following.
lim x → ∞ x - 1 x + 1 x = lim x → ∞ 1 - 1 x 1 + 1 x x = 1 - 0 1 + 0 ∞ = 1 ∞
In the answer, we again got the same thing as in the previous problem, therefore, we can again use the second remarkable limit. Next we need to select at the base power function whole part:
x - 1 x + 1 = x + 1 - 2 x + 1 = x + 1 x + 1 - 2 x + 1 = 1 - 2 x + 1
After this, the limit takes on the following form:
lim x → ∞ x - 1 x + 1 x = 1 ∞ = lim x → ∞ 1 - 2 x + 1 x
Replace variables. Let's assume that t = - x + 1 2 ⇒ 2 t = - x - 1 ⇒ x = - 2 t - 1 ; if x → ∞, then t → ∞.
After that, we write down what we got in the original limit:
lim x → ∞ x - 1 x + 1 x = 1 ∞ = lim x → ∞ 1 - 2 x + 1 x = lim x → ∞ 1 + 1 t - 2 t - 1 = = lim x → ∞ 1 + 1 t - 2 t 1 + 1 t - 1 = lim x → ∞ 1 + 1 t - 2 t lim x → ∞ 1 + 1 t - 1 = = lim x → ∞ 1 + 1 t t - 2 1 + 1 ∞ = e - 2 · (1 + 0) - 1 = e - 2
To perform this transformation, we used the basic properties of limits and powers.
Answer: lim x → ∞ x - 1 x + 1 x = e - 2 .
Example 3
Calculate the limit lim x → ∞ x 3 + 1 x 3 + 2 x 2 - 1 3 x 4 2 x 3 - 5 .
Solution
lim x → ∞ x 3 + 1 x 3 + 2 x 2 - 1 3 x 4 2 x 3 - 5 = lim x → ∞ 1 + 1 x 3 1 + 2 x - 1 x 3 3 2 x - 5 x 4 = = 1 + 0 1 + 0 - 0 3 0 - 0 = 1 ∞
After that, we need to transform the function to apply the second great limit. We got the following:
lim x → ∞ x 3 + 1 x 3 + 2 x 2 - 1 3 x 4 2 x 3 - 5 = 1 ∞ = lim x → ∞ x 3 - 2 x 2 - 1 - 2 x 2 + 2 x 3 + 2 x 2 - 1 3 x 4 2 x 3 - 5 = = lim x → ∞ 1 + - 2 x 2 + 2 x 3 + 2 x 2 - 1 3 x 4 2 x 3 - 5
lim x → ∞ 1 + - 2 x 2 + 2 x 3 + 2 x 2 - 1 3 x 4 2 x 3 - 5 = lim x → ∞ 1 + - 2 x 2 + 2 x 3 + 2 x 2 - 1 x 3 + 2 x 2 - 1 - 2 x 2 + 2 - 2 x 2 + 2 x 3 + 2 x 2 - 1 3 x 4 2 x 3 - 5 = = lim x → ∞ 1 + - 2 x 2 + 2 x 3 + 2 x 2 - 1 x 3 + 2 x 2 - 1 - 2 x 2 + 2 - 2 x 2 + 2 x 3 + 2 x 2 - 1 3 x 4 2 x 3 - 5
Since we now have the same exponents in the numerator and denominator of the fraction (equal to six), the limit of the fraction at infinity will be equal to the ratio of these coefficients at higher powers.
lim x → ∞ 1 + - 2 x 2 + 2 x 3 + 2 x 2 - 1 x 3 + 2 x 2 - 1 - 2 x 2 + 2 - 2 x 2 + 2 x 3 + 2 x 2 - 1 3 x 4 2 x 3 - 5 = = lim x → ∞ 1 + - 2 x 2 + 2 x 3 + 2 x 2 - 1 x 3 + 2 x 2 - 1 - 2 x 2 + 2 - 6 2 = lim x → ∞ 1 + - 2 x 2 + 2 x 3 + 2 x 2 - 1 x 3 + 2 x 2 - 1 - 2 x 2 + 2 - 3
By substituting t = x 2 + 2 x 2 - 1 - 2 x 2 + 2 we get a second remarkable limit. Means what:
lim x → ∞ 1 + - 2 x 2 + 2 x 3 + 2 x 2 - 1 x 3 + 2 x 2 - 1 - 2 x 2 + 2 - 3 = lim x → ∞ 1 + 1 t t - 3 = e - 3
Answer: lim x → ∞ x 3 + 1 x 3 + 2 x 2 - 1 3 x 4 2 x 3 - 5 = e - 3 .
conclusions
Uncertainty 1 ∞, i.e. unity to an infinite power is a power-law uncertainty, therefore, it can be revealed using the rules for finding the limits of exponential power functions.
If you notice an error in the text, please highlight it and press Ctrl+Enter
The first remarkable limit is called the following equality:
\begin(equation)\lim_(\alpha\to(0))\frac(\sin\alpha)(\alpha)=1 \end(equation)
Since for $\alpha\to(0)$ we have $\sin\alpha\to(0)$, they say that the first remarkable limit reveals an uncertainty of the form $\frac(0)(0)$. Generally speaking, in formula (1), instead of the variable $\alpha$, any expression can be placed under the sine sign and in the denominator, as long as two conditions are met:
- The expressions under the sine sign and in the denominator simultaneously tend to zero, i.e. there is uncertainty of the form $\frac(0)(0)$.
- The expressions under the sine sign and in the denominator are the same.
Corollaries from the first remarkable limit are also often used:
\begin(equation) \lim_(\alpha\to(0))\frac(\tg\alpha)(\alpha)=1 \end(equation) \begin(equation) \lim_(\alpha\to(0) )\frac(\arcsin\alpha)(\alpha)=1 \end(equation) \begin(equation) \lim_(\alpha\to(0))\frac(\arctg\alpha)(\alpha)=1 \end(equation)
Eleven examples are solved on this page. Example No. 1 is devoted to the proof of formulas (2)-(4). Examples No. 2, No. 3, No. 4 and No. 5 contain solutions with detailed comments. Examples No. 6-10 contain solutions with virtually no comments, because detailed explanations were given in previous examples. The solution uses some trigonometric formulas that can be found.
Let me note that the presence of trigonometric functions coupled with the uncertainty $\frac (0) (0)$ does not necessarily mean the application of the first remarkable limit. Sometimes simple things are enough trigonometric transformations, - for example, see .
Example No. 1
Prove that $\lim_(\alpha\to(0))\frac(\tg\alpha)(\alpha)=1$, $\lim_(\alpha\to(0))\frac(\arcsin\alpha )(\alpha)=1$, $\lim_(\alpha\to(0))\frac(\arctg\alpha)(\alpha)=1$.
a) Since $\tg\alpha=\frac(\sin\alpha)(\cos\alpha)$, then:
$$ \lim_(\alpha\to(0))\frac(\tg(\alpha))(\alpha)=\left|\frac(0)(0)\right| =\lim_(\alpha\to(0))\frac(\sin(\alpha))(\alpha\cos(\alpha)) $$
Since $\lim_(\alpha\to(0))\cos(0)=1$ and $\lim_(\alpha\to(0))\frac(\sin\alpha)(\alpha)=1$ , That:
$$ \lim_(\alpha\to(0))\frac(\sin(\alpha))(\alpha\cos(\alpha)) =\frac(\displaystyle\lim_(\alpha\to(0)) \frac(\sin(\alpha))(\alpha))(\displaystyle\lim_(\alpha\to(0))\cos(\alpha)) =\frac(1)(1) =1. $$
b) Let's make the change $\alpha=\sin(y)$. Since $\sin(0)=0$, then from the condition $\alpha\to(0)$ we have $y\to(0)$. In addition, there is a neighborhood of zero in which $\arcsin\alpha=\arcsin(\sin(y))=y$, so:
$$ \lim_(\alpha\to(0))\frac(\arcsin\alpha)(\alpha)=\left|\frac(0)(0)\right| =\lim_(y\to(0))\frac(y)(\sin(y)) =\lim_(y\to(0))\frac(1)(\frac(\sin(y))( y)) =\frac(1)(\displaystyle\lim_(y\to(0))\frac(\sin(y))(y)) =\frac(1)(1) =1. $$
The equality $\lim_(\alpha\to(0))\frac(\arcsin\alpha)(\alpha)=1$ has been proven.
c) Let's make the replacement $\alpha=\tg(y)$. Since $\tg(0)=0$, then the conditions $\alpha\to(0)$ and $y\to(0)$ are equivalent. In addition, there is a neighborhood of zero in which $\arctg\alpha=\arctg\tg(y))=y$, therefore, based on the results of point a), we will have:
$$ \lim_(\alpha\to(0))\frac(\arctg\alpha)(\alpha)=\left|\frac(0)(0)\right| =\lim_(y\to(0))\frac(y)(\tg(y)) =\lim_(y\to(0))\frac(1)(\frac(\tg(y))( y)) =\frac(1)(\displaystyle\lim_(y\to(0))\frac(\tg(y))(y)) =\frac(1)(1) =1. $$
The equality $\lim_(\alpha\to(0))\frac(\arctg\alpha)(\alpha)=1$ has been proven.
Equalities a), b), c) are often used along with the first remarkable limit.
Example No. 2
Calculate the limit $\lim_(x\to(2))\frac(\sin\left(\frac(x^2-4)(x+7)\right))(\frac(x^2-4)( x+7))$.
Since $\lim_(x\to(2))\frac(x^2-4)(x+7)=\frac(2^2-4)(2+7)=0$ and $\lim_( x\to(2))\sin\left(\frac(x^2-4)(x+7)\right)=\sin(0)=0$, i.e. and both the numerator and denominator of the fraction simultaneously tend to zero, then here we are dealing with an uncertainty of the form $\frac(0)(0)$, i.e. done. In addition, it is clear that the expressions under the sine sign and in the denominator coincide (i.e., and is satisfied):
So, both conditions listed at the beginning of the page are met. It follows from this that the formula is applicable, i.e. $\lim_(x\to(2)) \frac(\sin\left(\frac(x^2-4)(x+7)\right))(\frac(x^2-4)(x+ 7))=1$.
Answer: $\lim_(x\to(2))\frac(\sin\left(\frac(x^2-4)(x+7)\right))(\frac(x^2-4)(x +7))=1$.
Example No. 3
Find $\lim_(x\to(0))\frac(\sin(9x))(x)$.
Since $\lim_(x\to(0))\sin(9x)=0$ and $\lim_(x\to(0))x=0$, then we are dealing with an uncertainty of the form $\frac(0 )(0)$, i.e. done. However, the expressions under the sine sign and in the denominator do not coincide. Here you need to adjust the expression in the denominator to the desired form. We need the expression $9x$ to be in the denominator, then it will become true. Essentially, we're missing a factor of $9$ in the denominator, which isn't that hard to enter—just multiply the expression in the denominator by $9$. Naturally, to compensate for multiplication by $9$, you will have to immediately divide by $9$:
$$ \lim_(x\to(0))\frac(\sin(9x))(x)=\left|\frac(0)(0)\right| =\lim_(x\to(0))\frac(\sin(9x))(9x\cdot\frac(1)(9)) =9\lim_(x\to(0))\frac(\sin (9x))(9x)$$
Now the expressions in the denominator and under the sine sign coincide. Both conditions for the limit $\lim_(x\to(0))\frac(\sin(9x))(9x)$ are satisfied. Therefore, $\lim_(x\to(0))\frac(\sin(9x))(9x)=1$. And this means that:
$$ 9\lim_(x\to(0))\frac(\sin(9x))(9x)=9\cdot(1)=9. $$
Answer: $\lim_(x\to(0))\frac(\sin(9x))(x)=9$.
Example No. 4
Find $\lim_(x\to(0))\frac(\sin(5x))(\tg(8x))$.
Since $\lim_(x\to(0))\sin(5x)=0$ and $\lim_(x\to(0))\tg(8x)=0$, here we are dealing with uncertainty of the form $\frac(0)(0)$. However, the form of the first remarkable limit is violated. A numerator containing $\sin(5x)$ requires a denominator of $5x$. In this situation, the easiest way is to divide the numerator by $5x$, and immediately multiply by $5x$. In addition, we will perform a similar operation with the denominator, multiplying and dividing $\tg(8x)$ by $8x$:
$$\lim_(x\to(0))\frac(\sin(5x))(\tg(8x))=\left|\frac(0)(0)\right| =\lim_(x\to(0))\frac(\frac(\sin(5x))(5x)\cdot(5x))(\frac(\tg(8x))(8x)\cdot(8x) )$$
Reducing by $x$ and taking the constant $\frac(5)(8)$ outside the limit sign, we get:
$$ \lim_(x\to(0))\frac(\frac(\sin(5x))(5x)\cdot(5x))(\frac(\tg(8x))(8x)\cdot(8x )) =\frac(5)(8)\cdot\lim_(x\to(0))\frac(\frac(\sin(5x))(5x))(\frac(\tg(8x))( 8x)) $$
Note that $\lim_(x\to(0))\frac(\sin(5x))(5x)$ fully satisfies the requirements for the first remarkable limit. To find $\lim_(x\to(0))\frac(\tg(8x))(8x)$ the following formula is applicable:
$$ \frac(5)(8)\cdot\lim_(x\to(0))\frac(\frac(\sin(5x))(5x))(\frac(\tg(8x))(8x )) =\frac(5)(8)\cdot\frac(\displaystyle\lim_(x\to(0))\frac(\sin(5x))(5x))(\displaystyle\lim_(x\to (0))\frac(\tg(8x))(8x)) =\frac(5)(8)\cdot\frac(1)(1) =\frac(5)(8). $$
Answer: $\lim_(x\to(0))\frac(\sin(5x))(\tg(8x))=\frac(5)(8)$.
Example No. 5
Find $\lim_(x\to(0))\frac(\cos(5x)-\cos^3(5x))(x^2)$.
Since $\lim_(x\to(0))(\cos(5x)-\cos^3(5x))=1-1=0$ (remember that $\cos(0)=1$) and $\lim_(x\to(0))x^2=0$, then we are dealing with uncertainty of the form $\frac(0)(0)$. However, in order to apply the first remarkable limit, you should get rid of the cosine in the numerator, moving on to sines (in order to then apply the formula) or tangents (in order to then apply the formula). This can be done with the following transformation:
$$\cos(5x)-\cos^3(5x)=\cos(5x)\cdot\left(1-\cos^2(5x)\right)$$ $$\cos(5x)-\cos ^3(5x)=\cos(5x)\cdot\left(1-\cos^2(5x)\right)=\cos(5x)\cdot\sin^2(5x).$$
Let's go back to the limit:
$$ \lim_(x\to(0))\frac(\cos(5x)-\cos^3(5x))(x^2)=\left|\frac(0)(0)\right| =\lim_(x\to(0))\frac(\cos(5x)\cdot\sin^2(5x))(x^2) =\lim_(x\to(0))\left(\cos (5x)\cdot\frac(\sin^2(5x))(x^2)\right) $$
The fraction $\frac(\sin^2(5x))(x^2)$ is already close to the form required for the first remarkable limit. Let's work a little with the fraction $\frac(\sin^2(5x))(x^2)$, adjusting it to the first remarkable limit (note that the expressions in the numerator and under the sine must match):
$$\frac(\sin^2(5x))(x^2)=\frac(\sin^2(5x))(25x^2\cdot\frac(1)(25))=25\cdot\ frac(\sin^2(5x))(25x^2)=25\cdot\left(\frac(\sin(5x))(5x)\right)^2$$
Let's return to the limit in question:
$$ \lim_(x\to(0))\left(\cos(5x)\cdot\frac(\sin^2(5x))(x^2)\right) =\lim_(x\to(0 ))\left(25\cos(5x)\cdot\left(\frac(\sin(5x))(5x)\right)^2\right)=\\ =25\cdot\lim_(x\to( 0))\cos(5x)\cdot\lim_(x\to(0))\left(\frac(\sin(5x))(5x)\right)^2 =25\cdot(1)\cdot( 1^2) =25. $$
Answer: $\lim_(x\to(0))\frac(\cos(5x)-\cos^3(5x))(x^2)=25$.
Example No. 6
Find the limit $\lim_(x\to(0))\frac(1-\cos(6x))(1-\cos(2x))$.
Since $\lim_(x\to(0))(1-\cos(6x))=0$ and $\lim_(x\to(0))(1-\cos(2x))=0$, then we are dealing with uncertainty $\frac(0)(0)$. Let us reveal it with the help of the first remarkable limit. To do this, let's move from cosines to sines. Since $1-\cos(2\alpha)=2\sin^2(\alpha)$, then:
$$1-\cos(6x)=2\sin^2(3x);\;1-\cos(2x)=2\sin^2(x).$$
Passing to sines in the given limit, we will have:
$$ \lim_(x\to(0))\frac(1-\cos(6x))(1-\cos(2x))=\left|\frac(0)(0)\right| =\lim_(x\to(0))\frac(2\sin^2(3x))(2\sin^2(x)) =\lim_(x\to(0))\frac(\sin^ 2(3x))(\sin^2(x))=\\ =\lim_(x\to(0))\frac(\frac(\sin^2(3x))((3x)^2)\ cdot(3x)^2)(\frac(\sin^2(x))(x^2)\cdot(x^2)) =\lim_(x\to(0))\frac(\left(\ frac(\sin(3x))(3x)\right)^2\cdot(9x^2))(\left(\frac(\sin(x))(x)\right)^2\cdot(x^ 2)) =9\cdot\frac(\displaystyle\lim_(x\to(0))\left(\frac(\sin(3x))(3x)\right)^2)(\displaystyle\lim_(x \to(0))\left(\frac(\sin(x))(x)\right)^2) =9\cdot\frac(1^2)(1^2) =9. $$
Answer: $\lim_(x\to(0))\frac(1-\cos(6x))(1-\cos(2x))=9$.
Example No. 7
Calculate the limit $\lim_(x\to(0))\frac(\cos(\alpha(x))-\cos(\beta(x)))(x^2)$ subject to $\alpha\neq\ beta$.
Detailed explanations were given earlier, but here we simply note that again there is uncertainty $\frac(0)(0)$. Let's move from cosines to sines using the formula
$$\cos\alpha-\cos\beta=-2\sin\frac(\alpha+\beta)(2)\cdot\sin\frac(\alpha-\beta)(2).$$
Using this formula, we get:
$$ \lim_(x\to(0))\frac(\cos(\alpha(x))-\cos(\beta(x)))(x^2)=\left|\frac(0)( 0)\right| =\lim_(x\to(0))\frac(-2\sin\frac(\alpha(x)+\beta(x))(2)\cdot\sin\frac(\alpha(x)-\ beta(x))(2))(x^2)=\\ =-2\cdot\lim_(x\to(0))\frac(\sin\left(x\cdot\frac(\alpha+\beta )(2)\right)\cdot\sin\left(x\cdot\frac(\alpha-\beta)(2)\right))(x^2) =-2\cdot\lim_(x\to( 0))\left(\frac(\sin\left(x\cdot\frac(\alpha+\beta)(2)\right))(x)\cdot\frac(\sin\left(x\cdot\frac (\alpha-\beta)(2)\right))(x)\right)=\\ =-2\cdot\lim_(x\to(0))\left(\frac(\sin\left(x \cdot\frac(\alpha+\beta)(2)\right))(x\cdot\frac(\alpha+\beta)(2))\cdot\frac(\alpha+\beta)(2)\cdot\frac (\sin\left(x\cdot\frac(\alpha-\beta)(2)\right))(x\cdot\frac(\alpha-\beta)(2))\cdot\frac(\alpha- \beta)(2)\right)=\\ =-\frac((\alpha+\beta)\cdot(\alpha-\beta))(2)\lim_(x\to(0))\frac(\ sin\left(x\cdot\frac(\alpha+\beta)(2)\right))(x\cdot\frac(\alpha+\beta)(2))\cdot\lim_(x\to(0)) \frac(\sin\left(x\cdot\frac(\alpha-\beta)(2)\right))(x\cdot\frac(\alpha-\beta)(2)) =-\frac(\ alpha^2-\beta^2)(2)\cdot(1)\cdot(1) =\frac(\beta^2-\alpha^2)(2). $$
Answer: $\lim_(x\to(0))\frac(\cos(\alpha(x))-\cos(\beta(x)))(x^2)=\frac(\beta^2-\ alpha^2)(2)$.
Example No. 8
Find the limit $\lim_(x\to(0))\frac(\tg(x)-\sin(x))(x^3)$.
Since $\lim_(x\to(0))(\tg(x)-\sin(x))=0$ (remember that $\sin(0)=\tg(0)=0$) and $\lim_(x\to(0))x^3=0$, then here we are dealing with uncertainty of the form $\frac(0)(0)$. Let's break it down as follows:
$$ \lim_(x\to(0))\frac(\tg(x)-\sin(x))(x^3)=\left|\frac(0)(0)\right| =\lim_(x\to(0))\frac(\frac(\sin(x))(\cos(x))-\sin(x))(x^3) =\lim_(x\to( 0))\frac(\sin(x)\cdot\left(\frac(1)(\cos(x))-1\right))(x^3) =\lim_(x\to(0)) \frac(\sin(x)\cdot\left(1-\cos(x)\right))(x^3\cdot\cos(x))=\\ =\lim_(x\to(0)) \frac(\sin(x)\cdot(2)\sin^2\frac(x)(2))(x^3\cdot\cos(x)) =\frac(1)(2)\cdot\ lim_(x\to(0))\left(\frac(\sin(x))(x)\cdot\left(\frac(\sin\frac(x)(2))(\frac(x)( 2))\right)^2\cdot\frac(1)(\cos(x))\right) =\frac(1)(2)\cdot(1)\cdot(1^2)\cdot(1 ) =\frac(1)(2). $$
Answer: $\lim_(x\to(0))\frac(\tg(x)-\sin(x))(x^3)=\frac(1)(2)$.
Example No. 9
Find the limit $\lim_(x\to(3))\frac(1-\cos(x-3))((x-3)\tg\frac(x-3)(2))$.
Since $\lim_(x\to(3))(1-\cos(x-3))=0$ and $\lim_(x\to(3))(x-3)\tg\frac(x -3)(2)=0$, then there is uncertainty of the form $\frac(0)(0)$. Before proceeding to its expansion, it is convenient to make a change of variable in such a way that the new variable tends to zero (note that in the formulas the variable $\alpha \to 0$). The easiest way is to introduce the variable $t=x-3$. However, for the sake of convenience of further transformations (this benefit can be seen in the course of the solution below), it is worth making the following replacement: $t=\frac(x-3)(2)$. I note that both replacements are applicable in this case, it’s just that the second replacement will allow you to work less with fractions. Since $x\to(3)$, then $t\to(0)$.
$$ \lim_(x\to(3))\frac(1-\cos(x-3))((x-3)\tg\frac(x-3)(2))=\left|\frac (0)(0)\right| =\left|\begin(aligned)&t=\frac(x-3)(2);\\&t\to(0)\end(aligned)\right| =\lim_(t\to(0))\frac(1-\cos(2t))(2t\cdot\tg(t)) =\lim_(t\to(0))\frac(2\sin^ 2t)(2t\cdot\tg(t)) =\lim_(t\to(0))\frac(\sin^2t)(t\cdot\tg(t))=\\ =\lim_(t\ to(0))\frac(\sin^2t)(t\cdot\frac(\sin(t))(\cos(t))) =\lim_(t\to(0))\frac(\sin (t)\cos(t))(t) =\lim_(t\to(0))\left(\frac(\sin(t))(t)\cdot\cos(t)\right) =\ lim_(t\to(0))\frac(\sin(t))(t)\cdot\lim_(t\to(0))\cos(t) =1\cdot(1) =1. $$
Answer: $\lim_(x\to(3))\frac(1-\cos(x-3))((x-3)\tg\frac(x-3)(2))=1$.
Example No. 10
Find the limit $\lim_(x\to\frac(\pi)(2))\frac(1-\sin(x))(\left(\frac(\pi)(2)-x\right)^2 )$.
Once again we are dealing with uncertainty $\frac(0)(0)$. Before proceeding to its expansion, it is convenient to make a change of variable in such a way that the new variable tends to zero (note that in the formulas the variable is $\alpha\to(0)$). The easiest way is to introduce the variable $t=\frac(\pi)(2)-x$. Since $x\to\frac(\pi)(2)$, then $t\to(0)$:
$$ \lim_(x\to\frac(\pi)(2))\frac(1-\sin(x))(\left(\frac(\pi)(2)-x\right)^2) =\left|\frac(0)(0)\right| =\left|\begin(aligned)&t=\frac(\pi)(2)-x;\\&t\to(0)\end(aligned)\right| =\lim_(t\to(0))\frac(1-\sin\left(\frac(\pi)(2)-t\right))(t^2) =\lim_(t\to(0 ))\frac(1-\cos(t))(t^2)=\\ =\lim_(t\to(0))\frac(2\sin^2\frac(t)(2))( t^2) =2\lim_(t\to(0))\frac(\sin^2\frac(t)(2))(t^2) =2\lim_(t\to(0))\ frac(\sin^2\frac(t)(2))(\frac(t^2)(4)\cdot(4)) =\frac(1)(2)\cdot\lim_(t\to( 0))\left(\frac(\sin\frac(t)(2))(\frac(t)(2))\right)^2 =\frac(1)(2)\cdot(1^2 ) =\frac(1)(2). $$
Answer: $\lim_(x\to\frac(\pi)(2))\frac(1-\sin(x))(\left(\frac(\pi)(2)-x\right)^2) =\frac(1)(2)$.
Example No. 11
Find the limits $\lim_(x\to\frac(\pi)(2))\frac(1-\sin(x))(\cos^2x)$, $\lim_(x\to\frac(2\ pi)(3))\frac(\tg(x)+\sqrt(3))(2\cos(x)+1)$.
In this case we don't have to use the first wonderful limit. Please note: in both the first and second limits there are only trigonometric functions and numbers. Often in examples of this kind it is possible to simplify the expression located under the limit sign. Moreover, after the aforementioned simplification and reduction of some factors, the uncertainty disappears. I gave this example for only one purpose: to show that the presence of trigonometric functions under the limit sign does not necessarily mean the use of the first remarkable limit.
Since $\lim_(x\to\frac(\pi)(2))(1-\sin(x))=0$ (remember that $\sin\frac(\pi)(2)=1$ ) and $\lim_(x\to\frac(\pi)(2))\cos^2x=0$ (let me remind you that $\cos\frac(\pi)(2)=0$), then we have dealing with uncertainty of the form $\frac(0)(0)$. However, this does not mean that we will need to use the first wonderful limit. To reveal the uncertainty, it is enough to take into account that $\cos^2x=1-\sin^2x$:
$$ \lim_(x\to\frac(\pi)(2))\frac(1-\sin(x))(\cos^2x) =\left|\frac(0)(0)\right| =\lim_(x\to\frac(\pi)(2))\frac(1-\sin(x))(1-\sin^2x) =\lim_(x\to\frac(\pi)( 2))\frac(1-\sin(x))((1-\sin(x))(1+\sin(x))) =\lim_(x\to\frac(\pi)(2) )\frac(1)(1+\sin(x)) =\frac(1)(1+1) =\frac(1)(2). $$
There is a similar solution in Demidovich’s solution book (No. 475). As for the second limit, as in the previous examples in this section, we have an uncertainty of the form $\frac(0)(0)$. Why does it arise? It arises because $\tg\frac(2\pi)(3)=-\sqrt(3)$ and $2\cos\frac(2\pi)(3)=-1$. We use these values to transform the expressions in the numerator and denominator. The goal of our actions is to write down the sum in the numerator and denominator as a product. By the way, often within a similar type it is convenient to change a variable, made in such a way that the new variable tends to zero (see, for example, examples No. 9 or No. 10 on this page). However, in this example there is no point in replacing, although if desired, replacing the variable $t=x-\frac(2\pi)(3)$ is not difficult to implement.
$$ \lim_(x\to\frac(2\pi)(3))\frac(\tg(x)+\sqrt(3))(2\cos(x)+1) =\lim_(x\ to\frac(2\pi)(3))\frac(\tg(x)+\sqrt(3))(2\cdot\left(\cos(x)+\frac(1)(2)\right )) =\lim_(x\to\frac(2\pi)(3))\frac(\tg(x)-\tg\frac(2\pi)(3))(2\cdot\left(\ cos(x)-\cos\frac(2\pi)(3)\right))=\\ =\lim_(x\to\frac(2\pi)(3))\frac(\frac(\sin \left(x-\frac(2\pi)(3)\right))(\cos(x)\cos\frac(2\pi)(3)))(-4\sin\frac(x+\frac (2\pi)(3))(2)\sin\frac(x-\frac(2\pi)(3))(2)) =\lim_(x\to\frac(2\pi)(3 ))\frac(\sin\left(x-\frac(2\pi)(3)\right))(-4\sin\frac(x+\frac(2\pi)(3))(2)\ sin\frac(x-\frac(2\pi)(3))(2)\cos(x)\cos\frac(2\pi)(3))=\\ =\lim_(x\to\frac (2\pi)(3))\frac(2\sin\frac(x-\frac(2\pi)(3))(2)\cos\frac(x-\frac(2\pi)(3 ))(2))(-4\sin\frac(x+\frac(2\pi)(3))(2)\sin\frac(x-\frac(2\pi)(3))(2) \cos(x)\cos\frac(2\pi)(3)) =\lim_(x\to\frac(2\pi)(3))\frac(\cos\frac(x-\frac(2 \pi)(3))(2))(-2\sin\frac(x+\frac(2\pi)(3))(2)\cos(x)\cos\frac(2\pi)(3 ))=\\ =\frac(1)(-2\cdot\frac(\sqrt(3))(2)\cdot\left(-\frac(1)(2)\right)\cdot\left( -\frac(1)(2)\right)) =-\frac(4)(\sqrt(3)). $$
As you can see, we didn't have to apply the first wonderful limit. Of course, you can do this if you want (see note below), but it is not necessary.
What is the solution using the first remarkable limit? show\hide
Using the first remarkable limit we get:
$$ \lim_(x\to\frac(2\pi)(3))\frac(\sin\left(x-\frac(2\pi)(3)\right))(-4\sin\frac (x+\frac(2\pi)(3))(2)\sin\frac(x-\frac(2\pi)(3))(2)\cos(x)\cos\frac(2\pi )(3))=\\ =\lim_(x\to\frac(2\pi)(3))\left(\frac(\sin\left(x-\frac(2\pi)(3)\ right))(x-\frac(2\pi)(3))\cdot\frac(1)(\frac(\sin\frac(x-\frac(2\pi)(3))(2)) (\frac(x-\frac(2\pi)(3))(2)))\cdot\frac(1)(-2\sin\frac(x+\frac(2\pi)(3))( 2)\cos(x)\cos\frac(2\pi)(3))\right) =1\cdot(1)\cdot\frac(1)(-2\cdot\frac(\sqrt(3) )(2)\cdot\left(-\frac(1)(2)\right)\cdot\left(-\frac(1)(2)\right)) =-\frac(4)(\sqrt( 3)). $$
Answer: $\lim_(x\to\frac(\pi)(2))\frac(1-\sin(x))(\cos^2x)=\frac(1)(2)$, $\lim_( x\to\frac(2\pi)(3))\frac(\tg(x)+\sqrt(3))(2\cos(x)+1)=-\frac(4)(\sqrt( 3))$.
Now, with a calm soul, let’s move on to consider wonderful limits.
looks like .
Instead of the variable x there may be various functions, the main thing is that they tend to 0.
It is necessary to calculate the limit
As you can see, this limit is very similar to the first remarkable one, but this is not entirely true. In general, if you notice sin in the limit, then you should immediately think about whether it is possible to use the first remarkable limit.
According to our rule No. 1, we substitute zero instead of x:
We get uncertainty.
Now let's try to organize the first wonderful limit ourselves. To do this, let's do a simple combination:
So we organize the numerator and denominator to highlight 7x. Now the familiar remarkable limit has already appeared. It is advisable to highlight it when deciding:
Let's substitute the solution of the first wonderful example and we get:
Simplifying the fraction:
Answer: 7/3.
As you can see, everything is very simple.
Looks like 
, where e = 2.718281828... is an irrational number.
Various functions may be present instead of the variable x, the main thing is that they tend to .
It is necessary to calculate the limit
Here we see the presence of a degree under the sign of a limit, which means it is possible to use a second remarkable limit.
As always, we will use rule No. 1 - substitute x instead of:
It can be seen that at x the base of the degree is , and the exponent is 4x > , i.e. we obtain an uncertainty of the form:
Let's use the second wonderful limit to reveal our uncertainty, but first we need to organize it. As you can see, we need to achieve presence in the indicator, for which we raise the base to the power of 3x, and at the same time to the power of 1/3x, so that the expression does not change:
Don't forget to highlight our wonderful limit:
That's what they really are wonderful limits!
If you still have any questions about the first and second wonderful limits, then feel free to ask them in the comments.
We will answer everyone as much as possible.
You can also work with a teacher on this topic.
We are pleased to offer you the services of selecting a qualified tutor in your city. Our partners will quickly select a good teacher for you on favorable terms.
Not enough information? - You can !
You can write math calculations in notepads. It is much more pleasant to write individually in notebooks with a logo (http://www.blocnot.ru).
The first remarkable limit is often used to calculate limits containing sine, arcsine, tangent, arctangent and the resulting uncertainties of zero divided by zero.
Formula
The formula for the first remarkable limit is: $$ \lim_(\alpha\to 0) \frac(\sin\alpha)(\alpha) = 1 $$
We note that for $ \alpha\to 0 $ we get $ \sin\alpha \to 0 $, thus we have zeros in the numerator and denominator. Thus, the formula of the first remarkable limit is needed to reveal the uncertainties $ \frac(0)(0) $.
To apply the formula, two conditions must be met:
- The expressions contained in the sine and the denominator of the fraction are the same
- Expressions in the sine and denominator of a fraction tend to zero
Attention! $ \lim_(x\to 0) \frac(\sin(2x^2+1))(2x^2+1) \neq 1 $ Although the expressions under the sine and in the denominator are the same, however $ 2x^2+1 = 1 $, for $ x\to 0 $. The second condition is not met, so you CANNOT apply the formula!
Consequences
Quite rarely in tasks you can see a pure first wonderful limit, in which you could immediately write down the answer. In practice, everything looks a little more complicated, but for such cases it will be useful to know the consequences of the first remarkable limit. Thanks to them, you can quickly calculate the required limits.
$$ \lim_(\alpha\to 0) \frac(\alpha)(\sin\alpha) = 1 $$
$$ \lim_(\alpha\to 0) \frac(\sin(a\alpha))(\sin(b\alpha)) = \frac(a)(b) $$
$$ \lim_(\alpha\to 0) \frac(tg\alpha)(\alpha) = 1 $$
$$ \lim_(\alpha\to 0) \frac(\arcsin\alpha)(\alpha) = 1 $$
$$ \lim_(\alpha\to 0) \frac(arctg\alpha)(\alpha) = 1 $$
Examples of solutions
Let's consider the first remarkable limit, examples of its solution for calculating limits containing trigonometric functions and uncertainty $ \bigg[\frac(0)(0)\bigg] $
| Example 1 |
| Calculate $ \lim_(x\to 0) \frac(\sin2x)(4x) $ |
| Solution |
|
Let's look at the limit and notice that it contains a sine. Next, we substitute $ x = 0 $ into the numerator and denominator and get the uncertainty zero divided by zero: $$ \lim_(x\to 0) \frac(\sin2x)(4x) = \frac(0)(0) $$ Already two signs that we need to apply a wonderful limit, but there is a small nuance: we cannot immediately apply the formula, since the expression under the sine sign differs from the expression in the denominator. And we need them to be equal. Therefore, with the help of elementary transformations of the numerator we will turn it into $2x$. To do this, we will take the two out of the denominator of the fraction as a separate factor. It looks like this: $$ \lim_(x\to 0) \frac(\sin2x)(4x) = \lim_(x\to 0) \frac(\sin2x)(2\cdot 2x) = $$ $$ = \frac(1)(2) \lim_(x\to 0) \frac(\sin2x)(2x) = \frac(1)(2)\cdot 1 = \frac(1)(2) $$ Please note , that at the end $ \lim_(x\to 0) \frac(\sin2x)(2x) = 1 $ was obtained according to the formula. If you cannot solve your problem, then send it to us. We will provide detailed solution. You will be able to view the progress of the calculation and gain information. This will help you get your grade from your teacher in a timely manner! |
| Answer |
| $$ \lim_(x\to 0) \frac(\sin2x)(4x) =\frac(1)(2) $$ |
| Example 2 |
| Find $ \lim_(x\to 0) \frac(\sin(x^3+2x))(2x-x^4) $ |
| Solution |
|
As always, you first need to know the type of uncertainty. If it is zero divided by zero, then we pay attention to the presence of a sine: $$ \lim_(x\to 0) \frac(\sin(x^3+2x))(2x-x^4) = \frac(0) (0) = $$ This uncertainty allows us to use the formula of the first remarkable limit, but the expression from the denominator is not equal to the argument of the sine? Therefore, the formula cannot be applied “head-on”. It is necessary to multiply and divide the fraction by the argument of the sine: $$ = \lim_(x\to 0) \frac((x^3+2x)\sin(x^3+2x))((2x-x^4)(x ^3+2x)) = $$ Now we write down the properties of the limits: $$ = \lim_(x\to 0) \frac((x^3+2x))(2x-x^4)\cdot \lim_(x \to 0) \frac(\sin(x^3+2x))((x^3+2x)) = $$ The second limit fits the formula exactly and is equal to one: $$ = \lim_(x\to 0 ) \frac(x^3+2x)(2x-x^4)\cdot 1 = \lim_(x\to 0) \frac(x^3+2x)(2x-x^4) = $$ Substitute again $ x = 0 $ into a fraction and we get the uncertainty $ \frac(0)(0) $. To eliminate it, it is enough to take $ x $ out of brackets and reduce it by: $$ = \lim_(x\to 0) \frac(x(x^2+2))(x(2-x^3)) = \ lim_(x\to 0) \frac(x^2+2)(2-x^3) = $$ $$ = \frac(0^2 + 2)(2 - 0^3) = \frac(2 )(2) = 1 $$ |
| Answer |
| $$ \lim_(x\to 0) \frac(\sin(x^3+2x))(2x-x^4) = 1 $$ |
| Example 4 |
| Calculate $ \lim_(x\to0) \frac(\sin2x)(tg3x) $ |
| Solution |
|
Let's start the calculation with the substitution $ x=0 $. As a result, we obtain the uncertainty $ \frac(0)(0) $. The limit contains a sine and a tangent, which hints at a possible development of the situation using the formula of the first remarkable limit. Let's transform the numerator and denominator of the fraction into a formula and consequence: $$ \lim_(x\to0) \frac(\sin2x)(tg3x) = \frac(0)(0) = \lim_(x\to0) \frac(\frac(\sin2x)(2x)\cdot 2x )(\frac(tg3x)(3x)\cdot 3x) = $$ Now we see that in the numerator and denominator there are expressions that fit the formula and consequences. The sine argument and the tangent argument are the same for the corresponding denominators $$ = \lim_(x\to0) \frac(1\cdot 2x)(1\cdot 3x) = \frac(2)(3) $$ |
| Answer |
| $$ \lim_(x\to0) \frac(\sin2x)(tg2x) = \frac(2)(3) $$ |
The article: “The first remarkable limit, examples of solutions” talked about cases in which it is advisable to use this formula and its consequences.