Artist, sculptor, architect, engineer, poet, anatomist... It’s easier to say who Leonardo da Vinci was not. For example, he was not an anteater. The Renaissance gave birth to many outstanding minds, but even among them Leonardo stands out as a bright spot, with outlines similar to the contours of Belgium. In the workbooks and scattered notes left behind by him, one can find the deepest scientific ideas that were many days ahead of their time. And rightly so! Until the last days of his life he tried to solve the mystery of attractiveness female breast or at least understand the meaning of his vague aphorism.

Dear readers! Our articles talk about typical solutions legal issues, but each case is unique.

If you want to find out how to solve your particular problem, please contact the online consultant form on the right or call the numbers provided on the website. It's fast and free!

WATCH THE VIDEO ON THE TOPIC: LEONARDO DA VINCI WISE APHORISMS AND STATEMENTS

Da Vinci tried to tell us: a terrible message opened the eyes of humanity, only a miracle can save

This portrait of Jesus is the most controversial, resonant work. Counts last job master, although many experts doubt the artist’s involvement in the masterpiece. Let's avoid the controversy. Let’s just look at the portrait carefully, as if we have no doubt about the authorship of Leonardo. Notice the transparent ball in Christ's hand. It seems like nothing unusual. If you look carefully, you can see tiny inclusions in the ball, indicating that it is made of the purest rock crystal.

And the inclusions are particles of quartz. Therefore, the ball is not hollow inside. Da Vinci, who studied the laws of optics, could not help but know about the refraction of light, as a result of which the shape of an object at the boundary of different media is distorted. Why is it that in the portrait the palm, the folds of Jesus’ clothing, blocked by the ball, look as if they are visible through an ordinary flat piece of glass? This is not so much a mystery as a legend.

According to it, da Vinci painted the images of Christ and Judas from one person, three years apart. Allegedly looking for a model for the image of Jesus, the artist found a suitable candidate in the temple: a young man sang in the church choir. Leonardo was the last to paint the image of Judas. The painting was almost completed, but the ideal face for the image of the traitor had still not been found.

The artist did not give up and still found him. It belonged to a pathetic drunkard lying in a ditch. When the painter completed the portrait, the tramp who posed said that he recognized the painting, because three years earlier he had posed for it as Jesus.

One of the interesting details of the picture is the overturned salt shaker lying next to Judas’s hand. Perhaps this is an encrypted hint of a sign about spilled salt, leading to quarrels and troubles. Moreover, the canvas captures the moment of Christ’s prediction of the betrayal of one of the apostles.

It is known for certain that Leonardo actually drew a sketch for the portrait. But historians doubted whether he then painted the portrait himself. It is believed that the painting was either unfinished or lost. Only one source indicated that the portrait was completed. Nothing was known about the fate of the canvas for more than years. Only in the city Research confirmed: the canvas belongs to the brush of da Vinci, with the exception of small details, such as a palm branch, painted by his students.

New technologies for scanning works of art have amazed scientists: it turns out that an ermine was not always present in the painting. Under the layers of paint, at least two versions of the portrait were discovered, one of which showed the lady without the animal, and the other depicted a different animal. There are two aspects to this. The first concerns the painterly qualities of this canvas, and this is a question for art historians.

And most of them are in museum collections. This painting is actually the only one that was in private hands. Because Leonardo's museum works are extremely unlikely to ever come to market. It is very difficult to transport such paintings even to temporary exhibitions. They are actually restricted from traveling abroad due to possible risk and difficulties associated with logistics and the amount of insurance.

How exactly did this work end up on the market and why was this possible? It was attributed to the brushes of one of his followers or students. And only in the middle of the 2000s it was bought at auction and after research work it was decided that the author was still Leonardo. But again, why did this work sell for such a sum?

Because there is an auction market and a buyer was found willing to pay that kind of money. Leonardo is not only greatest master the Renaissance, but for many centuries in general the number one artist in the mass consciousness until in the 20th century he was slightly moved by Van Gogh, Picasso and Dali, key person Western European picture of the world. I can't say for sure who bought it. What will he do with her in the future?

I think it is unlikely that there will be any speculation on it in the near future. This is pointless; anyway, no museum in the world can afford to purchase it, although many may hope to receive it sooner or later from a mysterious tycoon as a gift or for safekeeping. The price is determined by the name of the author and nothing else. No matter what is in the painting by Leonardo da Vinci, the price will still be crazy. Previously, there was a fairly widespread opinion that this was not his painting.

But experts decided that this was not so. I am not a supporter of the theory that he left in the paintings secret signs. I don’t know any symbols, although I am involved in his art.

I think that all this is speculation. I am absolutely sure of this: there are no messages in his paintings. There are certain difficulties in interpreting his manuscripts, because he wrote them from right to left, and they are read through a mirror. There may be some omissions, hints that we don’t know about. This was not invented by Leonardo; other artists also have paintings of this kind. For obvious reasons, everyone's attention is currently focused on the amount of money at which the painting was valued. For my part, I would like to draw primary attention to some of its details.

Born into the family of a notary. Soon after the birth of his son, the father left the family, marrying rich woman. Leonardo was raised for the first years of his life by his mother, a simple peasant woman, then his father took the boy in with him. When Leonardo was 13 years old, his stepmother died.

My father married again and became a widower again. He wanted to see his son continue his work, but Leonardo’s talent as an artist clearly manifested itself in his youth, and his father nevertheless sent him to Florence to the workshop of Andrea Verrocchio. In addition to sculpture, drawing, and modeling, Leonardo masters the humanities, chemistry, drawing, and metallurgy.

His teacher Andrea del Verrocchio trusts the talented student to take part in his works and allows him to accept orders for paintings. Having suddenly interrupted his work, Leonardo was inclined to abandon the work unfinished, and the artist left Florence.

The reason for his departure was the unfavorable attitude towards him of the Medici family, which was then in power. Leonardo goes to Milan to the Sforza court. There he plays the lute and becomes known as the inventor of weapons.

This work lasted until the death of the genius. In 2006 he received an order to paint the altar from the Franciscan Brotherhood of the Immaculate Conception. He has been doing it for three years. An interesting fact is that he had to go to court regarding payment; the trial lasted 25 years. Da Vinci invents a rolling mill, a machine for producing files, and a machine for making cloth. Also during this period, Leonardo created sketches of temples and took part in the construction of the Milan Cathedral.

He developed a city sewer system and carried out land reclamation work. In the year Leonardo becomes an architect and chief engineer in the service of Cesare Borgia.

During this period, da Vinci designed canals to drain swamps and created military maps. For the next decade, Leonardo wrote little, trying to devote more time to anatomy, mathematics and mechanics.

In the year Leonardo moved to Rome under the patronage of Giuliano de' Medici. Here, for three years, he studied mirror making, mathematics, researched the human voice, and created new paint formulations. In the year after the death of the Medici, Leonardo became court artist in Paris. Here he works on land reclamation, hydrography and very often communicates with King Francis I.

At the age of 67, Leonardo da Vinci died. His body was buried in the church of Saint-Florent-ten, but the grave was lost during many years of war. Part 2 - Documentary film by S.

About lessons in cheating from director A. And against this background, the question naturally arises: why did they pay so much real money for this masterpiece, which was also possibly fake? The main thing is that the picture is a fake. About the reasons for buying a painting for such a high price and what exactly this painting means, watch the video:.

First, some working information - for those who like to count other people's money. The name of the new owner of Leonardo da Vinci's masterpiece has not been disclosed. So this is what is shown in the picture?

This is, let's say, a tactlessly free translation. The correct translation is this.

Leonardo da Vinci

In this city he began to develop as an artist. The Medici dynasty ruled there, which at that time was headed by Lorenzo the Magnificent. It cannot be said that Leonardo da Vinci’s relationship with him was brilliant. Which, by the way, largely determined future fate artist and influenced his move to Milan. However, first things first. The future genius was born on April 15 of the year in the village of Ankiano, in the mountains.

On our website you will find the answer to the question What can I say - Leonardo Da Vinci 5 letters game Guess the words. The answer is GENIUS. Well what can I say Leonardo Yes.

What can I say - Leonardo Da Vinci! 5 letters. E Z V L N Y G I

He seemed to know the evolutionary keys to the secrets of the human psyche. Thus, one of Leonardo da Vinci’s secrets was a special sleep formula: he slept for 15 minutes every 4 hours, thus reducing his daily sleep from 8 to 1.5 hours. Thanks to this, the genius immediately saved 75 percent of his sleep time, which actually extended his lifespan from 70 to years! Painter, sculptor, architect, engineer, scientist - all this is Leonardo da Vinci. Wherever such a person turns, his every action is so divine that, leaving behind himself all other people, he reveals himself to be something given to us by God, and not acquired by human art. Leonardo da Vinci. Great, mysterious, attractive. So distant and so modern. Like a rainbow, the master’s fate is bright, mosaic, and colorful. His life is full of wanderings, meetings with amazing people and events.

"Savior of the World" Leonardo da Vinci. 5 interesting details of the painting - all about painting

Not a single prophet reported about the end of the world; scientists found secret signs predicting the demise of all things in many creations of the past. According to the researcher, Leonardo da Vinci depicted the world ending in one of his greatest works. It turned out to be one of his most famous works and the most reproduced religious painting - The Last Supper, representing the scene of the last supper of Jesus Christ with his apostles, as stated in the Gospel of John, Da Vinci depicted the feeling that arose among the twelve apostles when Jesus announced, that one of them will betray Him.

If he had been born in Florence, he would have been named the same. In small moralizing allegories about the punishment of pride, he uses elaborate theatrical metaphors, mixes scientific knowledge and folk wisdom.

Well what can I say to Leonardo da Vinci

The Guess the Words game has probably become one of your favorite puzzles. Let me remind you that the point of the Guess the Words game is to form words from letters. Each word is the answer to the riddle of the toothy bun. Guess the Words will test your vocabulary, erudition and attentiveness for free. The sooner you complete the task and give the correct answer, the more points you will be credited. Dear readers!

OTVETIK-GAMES.RU

This portrait of Jesus is the most controversial, resonant work. It is considered the last work of the master, although many experts doubt the artist’s involvement in the masterpiece. Let's avoid the controversy. Let’s just look at the portrait carefully, as if we have no doubt about the authorship of Leonardo. Notice the transparent ball in Christ's hand. It seems like nothing unusual. If you look carefully, you can see tiny inclusions in the ball, indicating that it is made of the purest rock crystal. And the inclusions are particles of quartz.

Four reasons why Leonardo da Vinci was ahead of his time in many of Leonardo's portraits it is almost impossible to say when.

Enter your question:

Leonardo da Vinci - Italian artist, painter, sculptor, architect and anatomist, naturalist, inventor, writer and musician, one of largest representatives art of the High Renaissance. It is difficult to name an area in which he has not made a significant contribution. Many researchers consider Leonardo da Vinci one of greatest people in history.

Leonardo da Vinci: "Adoration of the Magi"

What to expect when passing the medical examination for a driver's license. We are asked to provide characteristics from the place of work from the district police officer, from the police officer. A responsible and thoughtful boy. After the judge allows you to review the case materials, you can take photographs of the case materials with a camera or phone.

In what cases is it not paid?

Upon receiving the card, the employee signs the official statement.

Hey da Vinci! Hey, you son of a bitch Titan of the Renaissance! Unknown inventions of Leonardo da Vinci

What can you really do in this case? For violation of the obligations established by this Agreement, the Parties are liable in accordance with the provisions of current legislation. Russian Federation. Thus, carefully check the document received from the employee.

I waited in line in the stuffy corridors and was pleasantly surprised. However, not all multifunctional centers perform this operation to obtain to an individual taxpayer identification number. Contacting professionals, sending a request via the Internet.

Illegitimate child and beloved child: the secret of the birth of Leonardo da Vinci

In addition, these drugs are prescribed to patients with sleep disorders, convulsive conditions, anxiety disorders, phobias, psychomotor agitation on their own medical worker or by a medical worker by decision of the medical commission (if the head of the medical organization decides on the need to coordinate the primary prescription of such medications with the medical commission).

The application must be submitted and executed in person individual entrepreneur. It should be specifically emphasized that this rule applies only when concluding a fixed-term employment contract upon entering a job.

VIDEO

So, miraculously, a document has been preserved, which in its deadly simplicity demonstrates the vindictiveness of the Templars and is excellent evidence that a direct connection could easily exist between the Swiss mercenaries and the former Templars. This document is an order given in writing in response to a request from the French king for assistance of a certain nature. This order was signed by the military adviser of the Swiss army, who is responsible for the deployment and strategic placement of units participating in external military operations.

Accept the call for help presented by the French Ambassador Plenipotentiary, signed in the name of His Majesty the King of France. Allow no more than one... (month, translated into the usual calendar) to complete it. - Note ed.). For urgency there is an additional fee, which conditions are accepted and strengthened by negotiations with those asking. There is also an additional payment for the number of soldiers, which is considered more than usual. These conditions were also accepted and strengthened by negotiations with the petitioners. Send the youngest and oldest soldiers, deliberately selecting them from those on the register. Lieutenants should be sent from among those who survived minor wounds and were unable to perform other actions.

A magnificent example of vindictiveness. For the maximum amount of money ripped off the customer, provide the “best of the worst” representatives of the army.

But it's time to move on. By 1500, that is, by the time of our story, no one tried to encroach on the independence of the cantons, and Switzerland was expanding the borders of its possessions with might and main. By this time, the Swiss had acquired the reputation of magnificent warriors on a European scale, whom their enemies feared in awe, and their allies immensely respected.

The Vatican is guarded by the Masonic-Templar Guard.

By the beginning of the 16th century, the composition of this state, which declared itself neither more nor less democratic confederation There were already thirteen cantons. In addition, this young country had at its disposal virtually annexed, but not legally registered, significant lands, which the allies hastened to “push under the wing” of the Swiss army, thus protecting them from unnecessary encroachments. The bridgehead was prepared. It was possible to implement on a grand scale all the ideas conceived by the Freemasons regarding the formation of an invincible army, equipped with fantastically advanced weapons. An army consisting of true military professionals, educated and remarkably trained, capable of maintaining and applying any of the latest military technologies.

Now I have to stop throwing so much interesting topic halfway, pay attention to the history of Switzerland, looking much further than the events discussed in our book. This is due to the fact that most of the evidence indicating the involvement of this country with the heroes of our story lies in the further historical development of the democratic confederation, and also because the direction of our investigation will after some time be connected with the fate of this amazing country.

Another sophisticated revenge of the former Templars can be considered the introduction of their agents into the holy of holies of the Catholic Church. The Church, which is the most sworn enemy of the Templars, destroying the legacy of their organization for history. Moreover, the safety of the entire top of the church leadership is completely in the hands of these (former in name, but real in spirit) knights. I state this based on a well-known fact. The Vatican is guarded by the Swiss Guard.

The Templar cross is depicted on the Swiss national flag.

Well, the last two in this chapter are convincing evidence of the direct connection of the “power structure” of the Freemasons - the Order of the Templars with peaceful and prosperous country Switzerland. Proof one. After Switzerland withdrew at the end of the 17th century last group mercenaries from Europe, this country never fought again. Instead, she turned her attention to that branch of occupation that is already familiar to us from the contents of this chapter. Banking and everything connected with it is the basis and foundation of the well-being of the republic of the “Eternal Union”. The history of the Templar Order was completely repeated in the history of Switzerland. The Brothers returned to doing one of the two things they did best: war and creating the most efficient banking systems in the world. Indeed, why reinvent the wheel?

And the second proof. Anyone who opens a geographic atlas will be able to see this evidence for themselves. Looking at the Swiss coat of arms and flag. The Templar cross in all its glory is what is depicted on the symbolism of this small but immensely powerful state. The fact that it is slightly modified does not change anything. But the cunning knights of the Temple of the Lord managed to put subtext into an already so “transparent” hint, and encoded another message there. The Templars had a symbol of a red cross on a white background, and on state symbols In Switzerland it’s the other way around - a white cross on a red field. The first option meant “the blood of the Savior was shed innocently.” This was officially announced by the templars themselves. What does the second option mean?!

Chapter 10 IT'S HARD TO BE A GOD

Now is the time to return to the main character of our investigation - Leonardo da Vinci. There can be no doubt that its patrons and actual “creators” (after all, it can be considered that way) received from their “brainchild” everything they expected, and even more. But what did the brilliant inventor himself get? Was he privy to the plans of the Freemasons? Did he consciously participate in the implementation of their plans or was he forced to do so? If consciously, then what should a person feel if he carried on his shoulders a burden of responsibility that many times exceeded any conceivable limits? The answers to these questions will greatly help us in unraveling the secrets of the personality of this amazing person, which have haunted many admirers of his talent for several centuries.

Even none of Leonardo’s contemporaries had any doubts that he was a very controversial and far from clear-cut personality. What can we say about later biographers who wrote their works based only on rare and fragmentary testimonies of people who personally knew Master da Vinci. By the way, there is surprisingly little such evidence. And given the scale of the figure of Leonardo da Vinci, such a small amount of information about his life is completely incomprehensible.

In this chapter we will try to shed light on such mysterious “black holes” as, for example, his appearance, personal life, human preferences and character. Let’s also try to understand what role painting, so “useless” from a practical point of view, played in his fate. “Useless”, of course, from the point of view of the Masonic organization. Did Leonardo da Vinci write his immortal creations guided by the dictates of his soul, or was his spirit a prisoner of someone else’s will?

Perhaps we should start by getting to know the external appearance of a genius. Either Leonardo was absolutely not vain, or he simply had no time, and perhaps for reasons of secrecy, but there is only one portrait or self-portrait that could acquaint us with his image directly, and not from hearsay. And that one was written when Leonardo da Vinci was already far from young. In addition, a long beard and the same long hair do not give the opportunity to get a complete impression.

I don’t know who it is, but personally I was incredibly interested in what a person could look like, on whose birth not two people worked, as is usually the case, but many more people. To quote, I have chosen a book written by Leonardo's official biographer, the only one who knew him personally, unlike much later biographers. It's about about Giorgio Vasari and his book “Lives of the Most Famous Painters, Sculptors and Architects.”

In fact, to be frank, Vasari was not a man of great intelligence, and he was also overly talkative and arrogant. But since his testimony is an eyewitness testimony , then we can say that it is priceless. So, meet Leonardo da Vinci through the eyes of a contemporary.

The highest gifts are sometimes poured out by the will of heaven on human beings, in others naturally, and sometimes supernaturally. In a most amazing way, beauty, grace, and strength are collected in one being, so much so that no matter what this being manifests itself in, its every action is divine. Leaving behind the deeds of all other people, this being clearly shows itself for what it really is: a generous manifestation of Divinity, not human art. This is exactly what other people saw in Leonardo da Vinci; in his every action, except for the beauty of his body, which was not extolled by anyone, there was more than infinite charm. And such is his strength that no matter what difficult subjects he turns his mind to, he easily copes with them. The power of his body was great and combined with dexterity. His spirit and character were distinguished by royal greatness and nobility. The fame of his name spread so widely that he was held in high esteem by his contemporaries, but was even more exalted in his posterity. (In what sense?!?- Note auto) after death. Truly amazing and divine was Leonardo, son of Piero from Vinci.

Somewhat vague, but here is another quote from the same book:

With his charming appearance, which was extremely beautiful, he brought light to any sad soul, and with his words he gave a positive or negative direction to every firm intention adopted by another. He could restrain the most immeasurable rage with his strength, and right hand could crush an iron wall ring and a horse's shoe like lead.

So, in the end, we have a handsome man who had more than attractive facial features, and was also endowed with physical abilities that allowed him to bend steel rings and horseshoes with one hand. Wow, portrait. The overly pompous Vasari is nevertheless right. Rarely does one person combine both external attractiveness, extraordinary physical strength, and genius. Indeed, it can be said that Leonardo da Vinci was a man marked by God. But is it God?

I don’t know about you, dear readers, but after reading these two passages, I personally was left with some kind of unpleasant aftertaste. I suffered for some time, trying to determine what was the matter, but then I was still able to express my feelings in words. The above verbal portrait smacks of unnaturalness too much. It turns out that he is simply not a person, but some kind of android. At first I thought that perhaps the “high calm” in which these passages were written was to blame, then I thought that Master Vasari, who was an ardent admirer of the genius, had, well, let’s say, exaggerated somewhat. Or embellished it. Just out of a desire to give my idol more significance.

I had to look for descriptions of Leonardo da Vinci in other sources. Perhaps more objective. I wish I hadn't done this. In one of the books I found another description of da Vinci, more restrained in tone. But the content! Author - Wilhelm Heinrich Wackenroder. Book title: “The Outpourings of a Hermit - a Lover of the Arts.”

He was knowledgeable in all areas of mathematical sciences, was a serious connoisseur of music, had a pleasant voice and knew how to play the violin, and composed brilliant poetry. In short, if he had lived in ancient times, he would certainly have been called the son of Apollo himself. Moreover, it gave him pleasure to excel in various arts that lay completely aside from his main road. For example, he rode a horse perfectly and handled a sword, so that an ignorant person might think that this was all he had been doing all his life... His mind was given from birth the desire to constantly come up with new things, and this always kept him in an active and active state. tense. How gems can be decorated with a gold frame, so all his talents were complemented by majestic and endearing manners. And moreover, so that the eyes of even low and stupid people could see something outstanding in this wonderful man, generous nature also endowed him with powerful physical strength, as well as a very impressive figure and such facial features that aroused love and admiration in everyone.

For the sake of formality, of course, I did some more searching, but everything was already clear. Both the contemporaries to whom later biographers referred, and the few documentary evidence that has survived to this day from the time of Leonardo’s life, were surprisingly unanimous in their assessment of the appearance and manners of the genius. In light of the assumption I made that the birth of Leonardo da Vinci was the result of a long “selection chain”, the next and completely logical assumption simply suggested itself.

His mission and purpose was not only the creation of a superweapon so that the daring plans of the Freemasons to create an invincible army could be realized, but his very birth was the result of an experiment to “breed” a prototype of a person as a representative of a new “super race”.

And when I reached this point in my reasoning, a certain vague memory began to appear in my head. That I've heard all these terms before. Moreover, I have definitely heard about experiments being carried out aimed at breeding the race * supermen."

I didn't remember it for long. There was, there was such an idea and with exactly the same formulation of goals. Of course, this happened in fascist Germany, and the initiator of a series of experiments was the Nazi leadership, “fixated” on the idea of ​​racial purity.

“Ugh, what disgusting,” was my first reaction to such a bold assumption. Do I really have to figure this out? Well, of course I had to, but what could I do? Shouldn’t we stop halfway and abandon an investigation that has already gone so far? In order not to spoil the mood for myself or the readers, I will not dwell in detail on the description of the atrocities (there is no other way to say it) that were committed by Nazi scientists. One can only comment that these moral monsters were not fools after all and apparently intuitively sensed that a science such as genetics can radically change the view of what was previously considered exclusively “God’s providence.”

These, if I may say so, genetic scientists, “crossed” (there is no other way to say it) the best army officers and “purebred Aryan girls.” In the hope of breeding a “new human breed.” But this dirty story ended, oddly enough, very ineffectively. The “woeful breeders” did not succeed. That is, nothing at all. No such children are geniuses with superpowers or exceptional talents. Perhaps because they did not have sufficient knowledge? Or did they not take into account some additional factors? Or maybe the plan failed because the scoundrels encroached on the territory belonging to a fantastically powerful force - the Creator's plan?

Leonardo da Vinci could be the “fruit of a unique experiment” to create an improved model of man.

I don’t have the slightest desire to specifically answer these questions, but maybe we will still get answers if we try to study another question. Is it possible that what could not be done in the middle of the 20th century could be done in the 15th century? And could Leonardo da Vinci really, at least hypothetically, actually be the “fruit of a unique experiment” to create an improved model of man?

In order to continue the investigation in this direction, it is necessary to identify several key points, which can serve as a starting point for us. First, we need to take a closer look at Leonardo's talents from the point of view of discovering the "possibly programmed" ones, that is, those that would be necessary to fully characterize the superman that he was. And also try to understand - was da Vinci really a genius not only scientifically and artistically, but also had talents in other areas not yet known to us?

Secondly, it is worth taking a closer look not only at the statements of Leonardo himself, but also at his relationship with other people. If our assumption is at least partly correct, da Vinci inevitably had to develop not only social, but also communication problems. It is difficult to be “almost a god” among people who are significantly behind you in evolutionary development and not have problems communicating with them.

Leonardo da Vinci had a great gift of persuasion and was able to hypnotize people.

In order to take a closer look at Leonardo's talents, there is only one way. Refer back to documentary evidence. And since, of all the documentary evidence, the most accurate can be contained in the memoirs of contemporaries, we are again forced to turn to the pompous, but, in general, quite nice master Vasari. And what do we see:

Among his projects and drawings was one through which he wanted to explain to the many intelligent citizens who stood at the head of Florence his amazing plan to raise the Florentine church of San Giovani without destroying it in order to bring a staircase under it (I wonder why? - Note ed.). And he accompanied his thought with such convincing arguments that the matter began to seem possible, although upon parting with him, everyone internally realized the entire impossibility of such an undertaking.

Yes, if anyone had communication problems, it was those people who were unable to resist Leonardo’s gift of persuasion. No, but how amazingly worded! When parting with him, everyone understood the impracticability of the project, and throughout the presentation of the plan they sat like hypnotized donkeys, nodding their heads in agreement. By the way, I wonder if Da Vinci actually used hypnosis? I personally won’t be surprised by anything anymore. But let's continue our research. Let's read Giorgio Vasari further.

He was so charming during the conversation that he attracted all human souls to himself. Having, one might say, nothing and receiving very little, he constantly supported the servants and horses that he loved so much. He preferred them to all other animals, but he also treated other animals with great tenderness and patience. This was manifested, for example, in the fact that he often went to places where birds were traded. There, with his own hand, he released them from the cage into the air, thereby returning the lost freedom and paying the seller the required amount for this. Obviously, nature wanted to gift him so much that, wherever he turned his thought, his mind and his soul, he showed so much divinity in his deeds that no one could equal him in the perfection of his resourcefulness, liveliness, kindness, beauty and grace.

As usual, Master Vasari is vague, but quite eloquent. However, it is already clear that if Leonardo da Vinci set out to please a person (no matter why), he achieved what he wanted with extraordinary ease. We will return to this passage from the book of Vasari’s biographer, but for a slightly different reason.

Leonardo had boundless confidence in his own abilities and in the unlimited ways of using them.

In connection with a new look at the mystery of da Vinci’s personality, it’s time to recall the diary entries already mentioned in this book, in which the young genius, for example, planned to catch on the street and force tell about wastewater treatment plants the servant assigned to them. Or about the courtier of Duke Sforzo, who wrote in his memoirs that in any attempt to reprimand the young, but arrogant and purposeful Leonardo, people *the tongue stuck to the larynx.” It seems that it was not at all a matter of timidity among the representatives of the duke’s retinue, who were seasoned in intrigues and blasphemies. And not in the vanity and impudence of the brilliant military engineer and court sculptor. The source of such an attitude towards people could well be justified and boundless confidence in one’s own capabilities and unlimited ways of using them.

Just in case, at this point in my reasoning, I once again carefully re-read all of da Vinci’s diary entries. Yes, it is, as soon as it comes to communicating with other people - it’s a complete imperative mood and, indeed, the pressure of their author strongly resembles *Roman ram", in the apt expression of the same indignant courtier. But let's return to additional and possibly “programmed” abilities. After all, the assumption I put forward is so fantastic that the more possible evidence and any, even indirect, evidence is collected, the less likely there will be an error in such an important and so much clarifying point.

Having difficulty imagining what other talents could “come through” with a close look at the already odious personality of the medieval “unique”, I began to re-read all the documents in which, in one way or another, the personality of Leonardo da Vinci was commented. I temporarily put aside Giorgio Vasari's book because it seems difficult to expect anything else from him other than superlatives. Therefore, I decided to read the notes of those people who were not exactly in a state of enmity with Leonardo, but at least clearly did not like him. So to speak, for the sake of objectivity of the selection.

Leonardo da Vinci had a conscious photographic memory and was a unique encyclopedist.

I got lucky pretty quickly. In one of the documents related to professional activity da Vinci as a sculptor contains a very interesting observation. This observation was made by his direct competitor - the same court sculptor of Duke Ludovico Sforza, sculptor Dominico Ovieli. A description of the personality of this Dominico has not survived to our time; apparently, he was absolutely nothing special - neither as a person nor as a sculptor, because nothing is known about the existence of any of his statues. modern world. But for our investigation such a witness is even better. He certainly wouldn’t embellish a successful competitor.

Taken to court for a promise to sculpt an extraordinary bronze horse, Leonardo from Tuscany succeeded only in resourcefulness. He has been with our illustrious Duke for almost five years, and still has not made any progress in fulfilling his promise. But he knows how to speak so eloquently that the Duke, having summoned him for reproach, parted with him as having already fulfilled his promise beyond measure. The deception is so vile that no one at court, except our illustrious ruler, has any doubts that it was planned by this man from the very beginning. The insidious and inventive liar does not even try, when the Duke does not lead him to an answer, to begin casting. Now this unscrupulous man has found another way to ward off the ruler’s disfavor. He is glorious (famous - Note auto) because he can remember in his mind surprisingly large passages from a wide variety of books, including Latin ones. And also perform mathematical operations with unprecedented speed. Taking advantage of the fact that His Excellency the Duke often does not have time to read the books he needs or find the necessary passages there, the Duke became accustomed to calling the Tuscan to his place and asking him to recite certain words or numbers from memory.

Further it is no longer interesting, because, apart from the angry splashing of envious saliva, there is nothing else there. Well, here is another documented unique ability of Leonardo da Vinci. Nowadays this gift is called “photographic memory.” But somehow I suspect there's more to it than that. It seems to me that this multifaceted genius did not just automatically remember what he read once. It is quite possible that he did this intelligently and was a unique encyclopedist. At least this explains how he managed to use a huge amount of reference literature in his works. This moment, by the way, has been confusing me for a long time. When I noticed with what ease da Vinci used quotes from a wide variety of sources and with what convincingness he demolished the work of his colleagues that raised doubts in him, I often wondered: how did he always have primary sources of such different directions at his fingertips? In Milan, for example, there was generally a very run-down library. So you can expect that it contains serious scientific works on the most different topics, Leonardo clearly couldn't. But the presence of “conscious photographic memory” explains a lot.

Leonardo could simultaneously do two completely different things with different hands, that is, he could consciously control the activities of the right and left hemispheres.

Well, the last thing I was able to unearth is that Leonardo da Vinci had unusual and even, perhaps, supernatural abilities. This evidence was kindly “provided” by a close relative of Leonardo. To be honest, I haven’t fully figured it out - either a cousin or a second cousin. The part of the document where this is mentioned in passing has, unfortunately, suffered greatly from the effects of time. It is only clear that this is a relative. At that moment when “either an uncle or a brother” left this document for posterity, he, of course, did not think about anything like that, but simply wrote a letter to his respondent. It is also impossible to establish who it was.

As always, having visited my relative in Milan, where he has been living full-time for several years now, I cannot help but admire his brilliant ability to sort things out. When you get used to his manner of speaking and stop paying attention to his strange manners, which make you his slave, forcing you to give up all your daily affairs for his benefit, then you cannot help but feel awe at his skills and very practical thoughts. But most of all, as an unreasonable child, I am amazed by his ability, which should be shown at Sunday village fairs. When he began to do two quickly necessary things in my presence, but with different movements, using both hands at once, I experienced a blasphemous thrill, as if I had suddenly seen the face of the Creator in front of me. Great is the mercy of our Lord when it gives so much to one person.

Well, everything is clear and, in general, not even surprising. With such perfect symmetry of both hemispheres of the brain. Although, even among people with such a “genetic anomaly,” such a masterly conscious division of the activity of the nervous commands of the right and left hemispheres is considered a rarity and a special advantage.

Chapter 11 DOLL OF DESTINY

I don’t even know whether the contents of the previous chapter can be considered as a body of evidence. I put forward a very risky assumption in order to immediately accept even the most convincing evidence. We will have to temporarily put off sensational conclusions and check everything again. Only from a slightly different angle.

Leonardo could work 24 hours a day.

So far we have discussed exclusively the innate qualities of Leonardo da Vinci. Now let’s try to put his character, hobbies and what is now called “under the magnifying glass of truth.” leisure" That is, we, of course, already understood that this man worked like a clockwork hare 24 hours a day. But it is impossible to assume that he never rested or had fun.

Leonardo had absolutely no personal life.

There is another layer of secrecy that, if removed, would greatly simplify our investigation. True, in a very indirect way. The fact is that a person who decides to inquire how Leonardo da Vinci fared in such an important part of any human destiny as personal life, the presence of a loved one and, finally, family and children (even illegitimate ones), will be faced with a booming and almost absolute emptiness.

The unpleasant story that happened to the young Leonardo back in his homeland in Tuscany and which significantly tarnished his reputation over the centuries is, of course, a weighty argument in favor of the policy of hushing up this part of the genius’s life, but evidence of, let’s say, unconventional orientation is quite difficult to completely hide. Which doctrine, by the way, is confirmed by the emerging story of the failed trial. And it turns out that this accusation of dubious authenticity is almost the only documentary evidence of at least some kind of personal life of da Vinci. It is this state of affairs that has allowed the gay movement in the modern world to elevate this brilliant man to the rank of its icon. This, they say, is what kind of people are “with us.” It's funny, by God.

The modern gay movement has not entirely justifiably elevated Leonardo to the rank of its icon.

It would also be nice to try to clarify one more point, which for some reason very rarely raises questions among people who are interested in the legacy of the personality of Leonardo da Vinci, which is strange, because this point is very important and can shed a fair amount of light on such a controversial nature. Moreover, in our case, he will serve as a guide for further progress along the path of truth. We are talking about the degree of da Vinci’s religiosity, if any was characteristic of him at all. And it is the history of the genius’s relationship with the most “ideologically strong” organization of that time that will lead us in further investigation.

As for leisure and entertainment, there is not much evidence here either. But I’ll start with the one that sincerely pleased me, amused me and gave me, despite its insignificance, a very vivid idea of ​​what an unusual sense of humor this unusual person had. I concede locally on the pages of this book to Giorgio Vasari. This is the one who apparently had problems with humor.

He attached to a lizard, found by a gardener working in the Belvedere vineyard, and which had a very strange appearance, wings filled with mercury. When the lizard moved, its wings fluttered as it walked. He also gave her eyes, horns and a beard, after which he tamed her and kept her in a box. All the friends he showed it to were frightened and ran away in fear.

Well written. I imagined this picture very vividly! Leonardo laughing and his respectable visitors retreating to the doors in panic. Da Vinci's imagination was clearly fine. The modern ones who created horror films are, in comparison, poor copyists of other people's ideas.

Everything else that I managed to unearth in connection with the “leisure” of the great man is not so funny, but very, very non-trivial. Let's call on Vasari for help:

In one room he installed blacksmith bellows and attached animal intestines to them at one end. Inflating them through bellows, he filled the entire room, which was very large, with them. Those people who were in the room had to hide in a corner. He showed these people how transparent and airy intestines, which previously occupied very little space, became huge, arguing that this also happens with human talents.

...In Rome, he prepared a wax paste, from which he made tiny animals during walks, which were filled with air inside. When air was blown into them, the figures flew up, and when the air came out of them, they fell to the ground.

The later biographer of Leonardo da Vinci, who lived almost two hundred years after the death of the genius, the Frenchman Michel Tregny, is worthy of all respect, because he did a colossal amount of work to obtain and then process the testimony of his contemporaries about Leonardo, after which he wrote a small one, but consisting exclusively of reliable facts monograph. So, in this work of a French researcher, a very interesting observation is given, which gives the most clear idea of ​​da Vinci’s character.

Wanting to please and amuse his acquaintances, Leonardo da Vinci constantly came up with some new things and devices. A lion made of wood that could walk a few steps and reveal its chest filled with lilies, or a flock of iron birds that could fly. But contrary to the feelings he expected in people, with his crafts he evoked not fun at all, but some kind of almost superstitious fear in the people who saw them. Without giving up his attempts, over time, he became at first indifferent to the feelings his crafts aroused in people, and then completely abandoned their production. At the same time, when asked to make some kind of toy, he replied that if you make a likeness of a living one not for fun, but for the sake of simple curiosity, then it is blasphemous and unworthy of a person.

Original statement. Something tells me that behind these seemingly meaningless words there is some kind of thought that has been suffered and thought out more than once. So, with rest, everything is more or less clear. It's time to move on to the issue of personal life.

It's complete darkness here. Not even a single love letter. Not a single direct indication from contemporaries and later biographers of the presence of at least some kind of heartfelt affection. In principle, almost nothing but guesswork and assumptions made clearly at random. Not a single scandalous story. But this man worked at the courts of the most brilliant European ruling dynasties. He was constantly surrounded by beautiful and well-groomed women. But he himself was a very handsome man!

Somewhat angered by this turn of events, I, having overcome some internal barrier, tried to scour the Internet on sites belonging to movements for non-traditional sexual orientation, thinking that maybe these people so needed to count Leonardo da Vinci among their like-minded people that they were ready to do serious work. work in search of evidence. Nothing like this. All the same far-fetched assumptions and nothing concrete. The only thing the information boiled down to, which I was able to more or less confirm, was the constant presence of young people near Leonardo, whose talents and gifts he supported not only financially, but also by directly teaching them.

But this kind of vague evidence can provide food for speculation, but not for serious evidence. Although, of course, they lead to certain thoughts. The same Vasari, out of simplicity (or am I underestimating him?) gives one of these comments.

In Milan, Leonardo took as his pupil the young Milanese Salai, who was distinguished by his extraordinary grace and beauty, and beautiful, curly hair, which Leonardo greatly admired. He taught his pupil many rules in art, and some of the works attributed to Salai in Milan were actually corrected by the hand of Leonardo.

I absolutely do not want to descend to the level of the “yellow press”, in whose style they seek out facts from life that are dubious from the point of view of generally accepted morality famous people just to defame these people. Having made a forced admission that it seems that the rumors about Leonardo da Vinci’s unconventional orientation are based, albeit on shaky ground, I would like not to focus the attention of readers on this particular fact.

Was there such a feeling as love at all in the life of Leonardo da Vinci (no matter whether it was for a man or a woman)?

The position I have taken in this long-standing dispute is rather based on an attempt to unravel a completely different mystery. If we abstract from specifying which gender this person entered into (if at all) intimate relationships with, then main question still remains unanswered: “Was there in the life of Leonardo da Vinci such a feeling as love (no matter for a man or a woman)?” After all, this is very important for the most complete understanding of the personality of any person!

I was so passionate about searching for an answer to this question that I even abandoned excessive scrupulousness and began to carefully look at Leonardo’s relationships not only with women, as I had done before, but also at his reviews of the men around him. Nothing. That is, nothing at all. At least, at least remotely indicating the presence of an affair, albeit a short one.

How so? How can you live a short life and never even fall in love seriously? Thoughts about the existence of some, in modern language, “obstacles of insurmountable force” involuntarily come to mind. What could be the essence of these obstacles? Perhaps those people who, well, let’s say, actively participated in the process of “creating a genius,” deliberately created obstacles for the feeling that arose, eradicating it in the bud.

From the point of view of common sense, no matter how disgusting this meaning may be, such an assumption is quite logical. After all, if Leonardo da Vinci was central part genetic experiment, it is absolutely clear that after such “luck” as the birth of such a brilliant genius, the organizers of this experiment longed for its continuation. And such an uncontrollable feeling as love could lead the course of “experience” in a completely unnecessary direction.

The Masons benefited from Leonardo's unconventional sexual orientation.

After all, it is quite possible that the result of love (and especially for a woman, not a man) could be a child. And, oh horror, a completely random child from a completely random woman!! But if we accept this explanation, then a conclusion that is completely prohibitive in terms of the degree of cynicism arises. The Masonic organization that stood “behind the scenes” of this inhumane experiment was profitable Leonardo's unconventional sexual orientation. Also because, having information about inclinations that were so cruelly punished in the XTV century, it was possible to control a person completely stably throughout his life. Hold it on a hook inserted very deep into the throat.

But then it is not clear how the organization, which controlled and held even Leonardo’s desires in an iron fist, hoped to continue the experiment and get the “planned” children? Those very ones that should have become the next stages towards the creation of a “perfect person”. Stupid question. Of course, it could be forced. But Leonardo never had children! Not a single one, not even one out of wedlock. Or...or were they? It’s just that the general public didn’t need to know about it at all? Yes, perhaps this is possible. Even a woman who, willy-nilly, more clearly demonstrates the fact of expecting offspring, and even then, with a strong desire, can hide the fact of the birth of a child if she tries. What can we say about a man on whom, pardon the vulgarity, it is not written anywhere that he has just been involved in the process of creating this very child.

That’s when I truly repented that several months ago I took on the task of unraveling such a fascinating (as it seemed to me then) mystery of the personality of Leonardo da Vinci. Could I at that time have even partially imagined what abominations and abominations shown by people in achieving their goals that I would have to face? Of course not, to an ordinary person and it’s hard to imagine such a thing.

Leonardo da Vinci, who turned out to be just a toy in the hands of experienced and soulless “puppeteers” - the Freemasons.

But it’s too late to repent of your own indiscretion. Whether I wanted it or not, I could no longer stop at this point in my investigation. And not at all because banal curiosity moved me forward. I’m not a street onlooker who, without looking up, looks at a pedestrian crushed by a car. Not at all. I just couldn’t help but feel enormous sympathy for this great man, who turned out to be just a toy in the hands of experienced and soulless “puppeteers.”

How was this immensely talented and, it seems, also immensely unhappy man supposed to feel, realizing that neither his life nor his soul belonged to himself? It’s terrible to live like this, completely alone, illuminated only by the light of your own genius.

I wanted to find evidence, to make sure that even such monstrous knowledge did not completely break this strong man. That even such a powerful system as the organization of Freemasons, capable of conceiving and implementing such global tasks, could not, by grinding his life into mincemeat, undermine his will to freedom. This is the evidence I wanted to find.

I chose the following direction of search - to understand how Leonardo da Vinci treated the very concept of “freedom”, this time. And to check whether he was looking for consolation from the only one who was not subject to the domineering hand of the Masons - from God. That's two.

As for freedom, remember, in the previous chapter I quoted from the book of Vasari, which told how Leonardo constantly came to the market and bought birds from traders in order to then release them into the wild? Now it’s clear what feelings could have prompted him to take such unconventional actions. When I re-read some documentary materials, looking at them from a new angle, I saw what had been lying on the surface all this time - a lot in Leonardo’s life did not happen and did not happen because of his fanatical desire for independence from rulers and any kind of superiors.

All the reproaches against him regarding the work begun and unfinished, all his quarrels with employers due to failure to fulfill his obligations, may have been provoked by Leonardo’s fierce resistance to the restriction of his personal freedom. And this is perfectly understandable. It was enough for him to feel the constant pressure of someone else’s power over the very essence of his birth and subsequent life in order to endure attempts to control him from some people, even dukes, cardinals and even kings, who imagined themselves to have this very power.

Naturally, da Vinci knew what he was dealing with. Compared to the real possibilities of the organization of the Freemasons, even the “great and terrible” Duke of Sforza, even the cruel and “frostbitten” Medici in their impunity, were simply foolish children playing for power.

It may be that " by-effect"The genetic programming of the superman is V his inability to love?

But all these discussions relate exclusively to Leonardo da Vinci’s attitude to freedom or to what he himself was forced to consider his freedom. But what about that very feeling, even if it was for a man, that was able to heal even the most wounded heart? I'm talking about love now. Why didn’t da Vinci even try to find such a “medicine for the soul” among representatives of his own sex? Is it really a “side effect” of the genetic programming of a superman that he lacks the ability to love? Could this really be retribution for the fact that a person is trying to measure his strength with God? And it is absolutely impossible to interfere with such a great sacrament as the formation human soul, nothing to pay for it. Moreover, it turns out that it is not the one who “calls the tune” who pays, but the one who is guilty before God only by the very fact of his birth? It's very possible. But this can no longer be confirmed or denied. And the gap in the several hundred years that have passed since that time is by no means an obstacle to this. There are simply mysteries of the universe, the answers to which are not worth searching for. At least for those people who do not set out to conduct godless genetic experiments.

Chapter 12 PROOF OF THE ACT OF CREATION

So, history shows that Leonardo da Vinci, for reasons unknown to us, abandoned attempts to turn to human feelings for help. But what prevented him from turning to another healing source for his disfigured soul - to faith in God? And did it hurt? Or, despite his more than ungodly projects, Leonardo did not consider himself an unbeliever; he simply meant by the power of God something much more than his contemporaries, who were very limited by dogmas and superstitions? Possibly, but don't jump to conclusions. It would be better, and more objective, to try to conduct a documentary study of this issue. Moreover, the answer to it, quite possibly, will lead us to the final point of the investigation itself.

If we talk about documentary evidence on this topic, then at first glance they all “cry” about complete absence Leonardo da Vinci has no religiosity, at least in its classical sense. The same (our old acquaintance) Vasari quite definitely responds to this topic.

And such were the bizarre lines of his mind that when he philosophized about natural phenomena, he sought to comprehend the properties of all herbs, while continuing at the same time to observe the movement of the sky, the course of the moon and the paths of the sun. As a result, a heretical view of things was born in his mind, which did not agree with any religion. Leonardo apparently preferred to be more of a philosopher than a good Christian.

As for the relationship with God (and not the clergy, please do not confuse it), the most obvious thing is the absence or, conversely, superlative This relationship is manifested in the work of da Vinci. More precisely, in that part that extended to painting, sculpture and architecture. If we consider this particular side of his life, bearing in mind a comparative analysis of his public statements and diary entries, then some deep contradiction becomes noticeable. Despite all its depth, this contradiction can be explained very simply, and it, by the way (like much in our investigation), is completely logical.

Leonardo da Vinci, with his such a powerful intellect, to take the word of uneducated and superstitious churchmen, who, being bearers of the “word of God,” themselves understood absolutely nothing about the essence and meaning of this “word,” would be at least strange. Apparently, I’ll have to make a small retreat and do my own comparative analysis. But I assure you, this will be done for very practical purposes, with a view to bringing our thematic investigation to its logical conclusion.

The institution of the Church at all times (except perhaps the very dawn of its existence) has always reminded me of the “struggle of the Nanai boys.” Meaningless in its very essence - after all, it is known that both boys are one person in disguise, such a “successful” clownery. Fighting against “enemies” and spending all means, opportunities and abilities on this fight, the Church at the same time served as a “factory” for the production and assembly of these very “enemies”. Now I am not talking about external enemies - representatives of other religions. We will talk about the so-called “heretics” and their new, more modern formation - atheists and agnostics, the number of which has especially increased since the significant breakthrough in scientific and technological progress.

The persistence of the Church institution in its dogmas, which boil down to the assertion that faith and knowledge are incompatible, has given rise to a kind of “watershed,” the essence of which boils down to the statement: “either you you believe or trying to understand.” And the fanaticism with which the churchmen adhere to such a radical point of view was precisely the reason why so many people who could be the pride of any religion and at the same time find “patented” peace of mind and “join the bosom of the Church” on completely legal bases turned out to be extra “cogs” left after assembly.

With her own hands, the Church has deprived itself of individuals capable of not only glorifying it for millennia, but also strengthening its influence on the path of development of humanity as a whole. It’s evil when you think about all these narrow-minded people who, interpreting and preaching every point of the Holy Scripture literally, at all times “got away” through hypocrisy and pomposity.

Let us leave for a while the dark and troubled times of the Middle Ages. In the end, then total lack of education and dogmatic (without additional explanations) faith helped prevent the death of humanity as a whole. I would like to think that due to the “visual morality” of the Ten Commandments. Unfortunately, common sense suggests that fear of "hellfire" was a more effective deterrent. But now, when the level of education even in the most backward countries of the world is higher than the most advanced views that existed in the Middle Ages!

But all this education is by no means able to support a person literally “crushed” by knowledge, the essence of which, when applied in practice, does not solve the main issues at all. But the “statement of the unresolved question” has not changed at all since the “Dark Ages” and it sounds like this:

“Where do we come from, where and why are we going?* One can finally understand that the total measure of objective knowledge of humanity changes over time towards a quantitative increase, but the questions that concern the soul remain unchanged since the birth of conscious humanity. Well, why not set the right priorities? What kind of sheepish stubbornness is this?

It’s great if it’s enough for a person to attend (yawning) a church service once a year, a month, a week... It’s hard to believe that such a person, observing “external” religiosity, will be in complete agreement with own life and fate. Well, let there be forced humility. But what to do if a person, for example, chose nuclear physics as his profession and, being talented, encountered in the process of his work issues that affect the completely non-material aspects of our world?

But the mathematical beauty of the creation of our Universe surprisingly contributes to religious awe. I think I can guess, based on historical examples, what will happen in such a case. Deprived of the minimum moral restraint, such a talented person will “not hesitate” to sell his discoveries to any group of people who can pay for them. But these people could, by the will of fate, turn out to be any terrorist group! So much for dogma. So much for “caring for every lost soul!” So, perhaps, instead of hammering into more than educated people that the most important thing in faith is humility and awareness of one’s own insignificance, it is worth paying attention to the “mutilation of the soul” of individuals gifted by nature with a powerful intellect as the most “valuable material”? By the way, in the 21st century the authority of the Church generally “hangs by a thread.” We can assume that any gifted scientist, who has seen “with his own eyes” and much more closely the majesty of the Creator’s plan, can (if he has such a fantasy) create his own and much more relevant and popular religion. In demand precisely because this religion will correspond to gross reality Everyday life a person forced to survive in an age dominated not by the soul, but by technological advances. And to get an answer to the question, what is more important - getting a loan for another “material asset” or peace of mind associated with the absence of debts, alas, modern institute The Church (Orthodox or Catholic) is completely unsuitable.

Other scientists believe that the issue lies in the peculiarities of the author’s artistic style. Allegedly, Leonardo applied paints in such a special way that the face of Mona Lisa is constantly changing.

Many insist that the artist depicted himself in a female form on the canvas, which is why such a strange effect was obtained. One scientist even discovered symptoms of idiocy in Mona Lisa, citing disproportionate fingers and lack of flexibility in her hand. But, according to the British doctor Kenneth Keel, the portrait conveys the peaceful state of a pregnant woman.

There is also a version that the artist, who was allegedly bisexual, painted his student and assistant Gian Giacomo Caprotti, who was next to him for 26 years. This version is supported by the fact that Leonardo da Vinci left this painting as an inheritance when he died in 1519.

They say... ...that it is the Mona Lisa model great artist owes his death. That many hours of grueling sessions with her exhausted the great master, since the model herself turned out to be a bio-vampire. They still talk about this today. As soon as the picture was painted, the great artist was gone.

6) When creating the fresco “The Last Supper,” Leonardo da Vinci searched for ideal models for a very long time. Jesus must embody Good, and Judas, who decided to betray him at this meal, is Evil.

Leonardo da Vinci interrupted his work many times, going in search of sitters. One day, while listening to a church choir, he saw a perfect image of Christ in one of the young singers and, inviting him to his workshop, made several sketches and studies from him.

Three years have passed. The Last Supper was almost completed, but Leonardo never found a suitable model for Judas. The cardinal, who was in charge of painting the cathedral, hurried the artist, demanding that the fresco be completed as soon as possible.

And then, after a long search, the artist saw a man lying in a gutter - young, but prematurely decrepit, dirty, drunk and ragged. There was no longer time for sketches, and Leonardo ordered his assistants to take him straight to the cathedral. With great difficulty they dragged him there and put him on his feet. The man did not really understand what was happening and where he was, but Leonardo da Vinci captured on canvas the face of a man mired in sins. When he finished his work, the beggar, who by this time had already come to his senses a little, approached the canvas and shouted:

– I’ve already seen this picture before!

- When? - Leonardo was surprised. – Three years ago, before I lost everything. At that time, when I sang in the choir, and my life was full of dreams, some artist painted Christ from me...

7) Leonardo had the gift of foresight. In 1494, he made a series of notes that paint pictures of the world to come, many of them have already come true, and others are coming true now.

“People will talk to each other from the most distant countries and answer each other” - we are undoubtedly talking about the telephone here.

“People will walk and not move, they will talk to someone who is not there, they will hear someone who does not speak” - television, tape recording, sound reproduction.

“You will see yourself falling from great heights without any harm to you” - obviously skydiving.

8) But Leonardo da Vinci also has mysteries that baffle researchers. Maybe you can solve them?

“People will throw away from their own homes the supplies that were meant to keep them alive.”

"The majority of the male race will not be allowed to reproduce, since their testicles will be taken away."

Do you want to learn even more about Da Vinci and bring his ideas to life?

At the entrance to the museum I came face to face with Perepelkin. The old man was beaming with happiness.

- Emma, ​​Emma! – He kissed me on both cheeks. – Today is the happiest day of my life! I was right! My hypothesis was documented!

– What hypothesis? – I didn’t get it.

– Well, remember, I told you that Leonardo da Vinci wrote two"Mona Lisa"?! So, now I have irrefutable evidence! Look!.. - he handed me some piece of paper.

- What is this?

– A copy of a previously unknown letter from Leonardo to another great Renaissance artist, Michelangelo Buonarroti. I have just received this copy from Italy, from my colleague Cesare Vasari. Professor Vasari is the world's leading expert on Leonardo Vinci. Just the other day, he discovered this priceless document in the storage room of the Milan Library. Cesare immediately made a copy and sent it to me. Read, Emma!..

I stuck my nose into the piece of paper.

“But it’s written here in Italian.”

“Sorry,” Gleb Borisych took the letter. – Listen, I’ll translate for you. – He adjusted his glasses on his nose and began to translate with excitement: – “Hello, my young friend Michelangelo. I will describe to you in detail my service with Caesar Borgia..." Well, this is not interesting to you, Emma. Yeah, here... “I recently completed a portrait of Mona Lisa di Antonio Maria di Noldo Gherardini. And imagine, dear Michelangelo, I fell in love with my own creation. Yes, so passionately that I simply could not part with him. Unfortunately, the painting was painted to order, and I had already spent the advance I received. But I found a way out of this situation by painting another exactly the same portrait to give to the customer. But you won’t believe it, Michelangelo, I fell in love with this painting, and I also couldn’t part with it. Only on the third attempt did I manage to overcome my love for my own creation. It should be noted that Signor Giocondo was not stingy and generously paid for my work. So now I can, without worrying about my daily bread, devote myself entirely to scientific research..."

“Wait,” I interrupted Perepelkin. – It turns out that Leonardo da Vinci painted not two, but three"Mona Lisa"!

Gleb Borisych slowly descended onto the steps of the Hermitage.

“Oh my God,” he grabbed his heart. - That turns out to be three. Why didn’t I realize it right away? Where then is the third “Mona Lisa”?

- I know where! – I exclaimed.

- Where?! – Perepelkin’s eyes lit up.

– What other space virus? – I was wary. - Come on, come on, read it, Gleb Borisych!

Perepelkin, without much reluctance, began to translate further:

– “...And the other day, dear Michelangelo, something happened to me funny case. During the meal, a meteorite fell on my plate. Yes, yes, a real meteorite. Only very small, about the size of a pea. It broke through the roof of the house, the ceiling and landed in a plate of spaghetti.

You, of course, remember, dear friend, that, in addition to mechanics and geology, I also study astronomy. Therefore, I immediately carried out a chemical analysis of the celestial body. I found carbonates resembling limestone in the meteorite. Inside these carbonates were particles of magnetic iron ore and iron sulfide, similar in structure and shape to similar substances produced by bacteria of terrestrial origin.

Undoubtedly, this pebble lay on the surface of some distant planet, and an asteroid crashed into this planet. As a result of the impact, pieces of sedimentary rock were knocked out from the surface of the planet and fell into outer space. My pebble was among the victims. For some time he flew in outer space, gradually moving towards the Sun, until he fell into the gravitational field of the Earth. And as a result, he fell to Earth, right into my spaghetti.

But imagine my amazement, friend Michelangelo, when I discovered a living microorganism on the meteorite. You imagine?! However, soon my immense amazement gave way to equally immense horror! After carefully studying the mysterious alien, I came to the conclusion that it is a deadly virus capable of destroying all people on Earth. This virus itself cannot be destroyed by anything. I was convinced of this through numerous experiments and experiments. The only way get rid of the killer virus - send it back into space.

I am sure that our distant descendants will be able to create aircraft that will move beyond the Earth. But the trouble is, dear friend, that before that time the damned virus can sweep across the Earth with lightning speed, mowing down all of humanity to the roots.

And this is what I came up with, Michelangelo.

I walled up a deadly enemy in one of the Mona Lisa's portraits. He carefully transferred it to the canvas and applied a layer of special paint on top. God forbid he ever escape from captivity. It’s scary to imagine what will happen then to poor humanity..."

Perepelkin read on, but I was no longer listening. My cheeks were burning. So, in one of the Mona Lisas there is hidden a space virus that can destroy all of humanity. And Madame Death tried to steal the Mona Lisa from the Hermitage. Both of these facts connected in my brain like two spaceships.

Death doesn't need a painting, it needs– VIRUS!

– ...he is flying off on a business trip abroad. In London. And when he returns, I will definitely show him this letter.

– Who is flying to London? – I asked mechanically.

- Yes, our deputy director.

- Kosolapov?! – I screamed. - When?!

Perepelkin was taken aback by my scream.

- Yes, right now. – He looked at his watch. - Literally in three minutes.

I grabbed my cell phone from my pocket and began frantically dialing Aunt Motya’s number. “If only she would return from Novgorod,” I prayed to myself.

Matilda Ernestovna, fortunately, was already at home.

“Emmochka, honey,” she immediately recognized my voice. - Come quickly. I'll tell you about Novgorod. Oh, what a beautiful city this is...

- Matilda Ernestovna, run to the bedroom and see if the Mona Lisa is hanging there or not!

- Why run? I already know what’s hanging.

- I am begging you! Look!

- Okay, Emma.

She went to look. Precious seconds floated away.

“Lord, Lord...” an excited voice was heard on the phone. - She's not there, Emma! She is not there!..

I knew it!

There was no time to listen to Aunt Motina's complaints. I already dialed the helpline number.

“Twelfth,” said the telephone operator. - Speak.

“Girl,” I shouted into the phone, “give me the number of the Airport Security Service urgently!” A terrorist attack is being prepared there!

The telephone operator frightenedly rattled off the number.

I called the airport.

“Airport security,” answered a male voice.

There was no time left to explain anything. And I used Volodka’s proven technique.

“Listen to me carefully, buddy,” I spoke with a hoarseness in my voice. “There’s a bomb on the plane to London.” Yeah I understood?

- Who is speaking?!

– This is the terrorist organization “Chizhik-Pyzhik” speaking.

The quail looked like a fish that had been washed ashore by a wave. He widened his eyes and was speechless at my call to the airport. Meanwhile, I already called Anna Lvovna.

– Stallion on the wire! – the general’s wife said.

- Anna Lvovna, go to the airport quickly! We must arrest Kosolapov at all costs!

- All clear! Let's go! – she said briefly.

I put my cell phone in my pocket and ran to the jeep.

Perepelkin finally found the gift of speech.

“Emma,” he shouted after me, “I don’t understand anything!” Explain what happened?!

- Then, Gleb Borisych! Everything later!

I jumped into the Pajero and drove to Pulkovo.

Chapter XXXIX

ARREST OF KOSOLAPOV

When I pulled up to the airport parking lot, Grigory Molodtsov was already waiting for me.

“Kosolapov has been arrested,” he reported.

- Cool.

“Imagine, dear, just a little more - and he would have flown to London.” But, fortunately for us, the telephone hooligan called and said that there was a bomb on the plane.

- It was me who called.

The super opera whistled in admiration.

“You have a head of gold, darling.”

“Yes, my pot cooks well,” I agreed without false modesty.

We went to Airport Security. Here I saw Anna Lvovna Zherebets and Vyacheslav Semenovich Kosolapov.

– On what basis am I detained?! – Kosolapov was seething. - This is arbitrariness!..

I took Anna Lvovna aside.

-Have you examined his luggage?

- Yes. Nothing suspicious.

I approached Kosolapov.

– Where is the painting, Kosolapov?!

– What other picture?!

– Which you stole from Matilda Ernestovna Conde’s apartment.

– Choose your expressions, girl! – he shook his finger at me. – This is, so to speak, an insult to personality!

Without thinking twice, I grabbed his finger and pulled him with all my might. The stallion and Molodtsov gasped in unison. Because Kosolapov has a hand... came off.

“Meet me,” I said. – A professional killer nicknamed One-Armed. Chairman of the St. Petersburg branch of the RAC.

– What kind of cancer?! - Kosolapov yelled. – What are you allowing yourself to do, little one?! Yes, one arm is artificial. So what?.. Is this a crime?!

“Bravo, bravo, Vyacheslav Semenych,” I clapped my hands. – I admire your acting abilities. But maybe, after all, stop playing the comedy?

“I don’t want to talk to you at all, you nasty girl,” Kosolapov said with hatred.

He took off his jacket, rolled up his shirt sleeve and began to defiantly adjust artificial arm to the shoulder.

My head was working like a computer today. I instantly understood where Kosolapov hid the Mona Lisa.

- Just a minute. “I took the prosthesis from him. Kosolapov wanted to start being indignant again, but when he saw what I was doing, his face changed. And this is what I did - I unscrewed the hand from the artificial arm. She followed the thread easily. Having unscrewed the hand completely, I put my hand into the prosthesis and pulled out a canvas rolled into a tight tube. When I turned it around, Stallion and Molodtsov again gasped in unison.

In front of us was a painting by Leonardo da Vinci.

“Well, Kosolapov,” I said, “let’s tell us how you came to this life.”

Kosolapov was sullenly silent, biting his lips.

- You do not want? Then I'll tell you myself.

And I began to tell.

– Since childhood, Kosolapov, you loved money very much. And when you grew up, your dream became to have as many of them as possible. And you decided to rob the Hermitage. For this purpose, you graduated from university and got a job as a junior research fellow. Here you discovered that the Hermitage security system is thought out to the smallest detail and therefore it is almost impossible to rob it.

You were about to become despondent, but then you were called to Smolny. It turns out that there was an art gallery there and a specialist consultation was required.

The gallery was guarded by a cheerful and good-natured guy, Yura.

And it had to happen that it was precisely in those days when you were working in the gallery that there was an attempted coup in the country. There was terrible confusion in Smolny. And when a huge crowd gathered at the gate, panic began in the building.

And you understand, Kosolapov, your finest hour has come!

You ran to Yura and said that the paintings urgently needed to be saved. After all, if a raging crowd bursts into Smolny, it will destroy the entire gallery in a hot hand. Together with Yura, you packed the canvases into waterproof boxes and loaded them onto the ANNA boat.

When the boat reached the middle of the river, you offered Yura a deal: half of the paintings for you, half for him. Yura indignantly refused your offer. Then you put a bullet between his eyes. And then they decided to sink the boat. It’s hard to imagine a better hiding place for paintings than the bottom of the Neva. But you were careless with the explosives, Kosolapov, and your hand was torn off.

Bleeding, you swam to the shore. And the boat sank.

In the city you had a doctor you knew who healed your wound, as well as a prosthetist you knew who made you an artificial arm, and with such skill that outwardly it was no different from a real one.

After killing Yura, you developed a taste for murder and entered into Russian Association killers. To be respected there, you painted your face with terrible scars. You also came up with a legend that you are an inveterate killer and have been wielding an ax since the seventies. The killers believed you and elected you chairman of the St. Petersburg branch of the RAC. At the same time, you went to work at the Hermitage and moved up the career ladder. Soon you became deputy director of the Hermitage.

In short, Kosolapov, you led a double life.

And so, the week before last, a priceless painting by Leonardo da Vinci was brought to the museum. At the same time, a strange man named Death called Club K and offered you to steal the Mona Lisa for him for a lot of money. If he had called a little earlier, you would have refused. But literally the day before this call, you met the eccentric old man Kanalitsyn, who showed you a diagram of the ancient sewage system of the Hermitage. And a daring plan was born in your head!

Yes, I forgot to say. Gleb Borisych Perepelkin, a major specialist in the Renaissance, worked in the Hermitage all his life. Once he told you his hypothesis that Leonardo painted not one, but two “La Gioconda”, and that this second “La Gioconda” hangs in the apartment of his neighbor Matilda Ernestovna Conde.

Naturally, you didn’t believe him, but you thought: since such an experienced specialist claims that the painting in Aunt Moti’s bedroom is by Leonardo da Vinci, it means that there is a copy of the highest standard hanging there.

And you, Kosolapov, decided to steal the Mona Lisa for yourself. And slip Madame Death a copy. For this purpose, you suggested to Perepelkin that the paintings be swapped, citing the fact that La Gioconda could be stolen from the Hermitage, but not from the apartment of an old pensioner.

Gleb Borisych took your bait and brought a copy to the museum. You let the head of security know about your plans; he also took your bait and allowed you to swap the Mona Lisa... Phew! – I took a breath. - Well, what do you say, Kosolapov? Isn't that how it all happened?!

- So! Yes, you mean girl!! – Kosolapov shouted angrily. – And how did you know?!

“A real detective, having received a minimum of information, will always be able to figure out the rest,” I answered him in the words of Volodka Vorobyov.

– You always got under my feet, Mukhina!! – Kosolapov continued to yell. – She got into my apartment!.. Organized an ambush in the museum!.. Stopped me from stealing boxes from a boat!..

“Okay, good yelling,” Molodtsov patted him on the shoulder. - It's time to go to Kresty.

- I don’t want to go to Kresty! - Kosolapov turned white as milk.

“Don’t be afraid, buddy,” said the super-oper. “It’s only hard for the first ten years in prison, but then you get used to it.”

And he took Kosolapov to Kresty.

“That’s it,” I thought. - The one-armed man has been arrested. Madame Death has been arrested. St. Petersburg killers have been arrested. Zurich sectarians arrested..."

In short, a complete happy ending, as Robert Figley would say.

– Where are Robert and Lola? – I asked Anna Lvovna.

- In the FSB scientific laboratory. They analyze the paintings to find out why Death needed La Gioconda.

– I can tell you even without analysis. One of the paintings contains a deadly virus that can destroy all of humanity.

- Wow! – exclaimed the Stallion. – Then I urgently rush to the Big House!

And she rushed off to the Big House. Well, I got into the jeep and slowly drove to Aunt Mota.

| |